Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 717-200 vs. Airbus A310

Compare

717-200

vs.

A310

Price (USD)
$33 Million$60 Million
First Flight
19981982
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
37 m124 ft
46 m152 ft
Wingspan
28 m93 ft
43 m144 ft
Wing Area
93 m²1,001 ft²
219 m²2,357 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m11 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
9 m29 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
55,000 kg121,254 lbs
157,000 kg346,126 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce BR715General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney PW4000
Max Thrust Per Engine
95 kN21,400 lbf
262 kN59,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
190 kN42,800 lbf
524 kN118,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
16,670 l4,404 gal
61,070 l16,133 gal
Range
3,815 km2,060 nm
8,050 km4,347 nm
Cruise Speed
822 km/h511 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
110 pax220 pax
Max Seating
134 pax230 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 717-200 and Airbus A310

Boeing 717-200 vs Airbus A310 Size Comparison

  • At 46.60 meters, the Airbus A310 is 8.80 meters longer than the Boeing 717-200.
  • With a wingspan of 43.90 meters, the Airbus A310 is 15.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 717-200 and Airbus A310 have heights of 9 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Airbus A310 6.80 meters taller.

Boeing 717-200 vs Airbus A310 Range

  • Airbus A310’s range of 8,050 kilometers is greater than Boeing 717-200’s range of 3,815 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A310 can fly nonstop approximately 4,235 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A310 can hold 16,133 gallons of fuel, which is 11,729 gallons more than the Boeing 717-200’s tank capacity of 4,404 gallons.

Boeing 717-200 vs Airbus A310 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A310 can accommodate 220 passengers, which is about 110 passengers more than Boeing 717-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A310’s max seating capacity is 230 passengers, compared to 134 passengers of the Boeing 717-200.

About the Boeing 717-200

The Boeing 717-200 is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for regional and short to medium-haul routes. Characterized by its efficiency and operational flexibility, it caters to airlines requiring a reliable and cost-effective solution for less dense routes. Developed as a part of the Boeing family, the 717-200 first entered service in 1998, marking Boeing's entry into the regional jet market. It was produced until 2006, with a focus on meeting the specific demands of regional air travel. The aircraft's production history reflects Boeing's strategy to offer a range of jetliners tailored to various market segments.

With dimensions of 37.8 meters (124.0 feet) in length and a wingspan of 28.5 meters (93.3 feet), the 717-200 is ideally sized for operations at smaller airports. It typically accommodates 110 passengers, providing a comfortable and efficient travel experience on regional journeys. Powered by two rear-mounted Rolls-Royce BR715 engines, the Boeing 717-200 delivers a total thrust of 190.0 kN (42,800 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 16,670 liters (4,404 US gallons) supports a range of 3,815 kilometers (2,060 nautical miles), making it suitable for various regional routes. The aircraft has a cruise speed of 822 km/h (511 mph).

In the competitive regional jet market, the Boeing 717-200 stands as a contender against models like the Bombardier CRJ Series and Embraer E-Jets. Its introduction provided airlines with a practical and economical option for regional networks, balancing the needs for capacity, range, and cost-efficiency. Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, and QantasLink have utilized the 717-200 for its operational efficiency and adaptability. Not many 717s are still in service today. Delta is one of the last airlines to be phasing out its own fleet.

The Boeing 717-200's legacy in commercial aviation is defined by its role in regional air travel. While its production has concluded, the 717-200 continues to be recognized for its contribution to the regional aviation segment.

About the Airbus A310

The Airbus A310 is a wide-body, twin-engine jetliner developed by Airbus in the early 1980s as a smaller variant of the A300, its first airliner. The A310 was designed to meet the demands of airlines for a smaller, more efficient aircraft for medium to long-haul routes. This development marked Airbus's expansion in the wide-body aircraft market, offering a versatile option for various airline operations.

With a length of 153 feet (46.7 meters) and a wingspan of 144 feet (43.9 meters), the A310 is notably smaller than the A300, making it suitable for routes with lower passenger demand. The aircraft typically accommodates around 220 passengers in a standard three-class configuration, though it can be configured to carry more in a high-density layout. This flexibility in seating allows airlines to optimize the A310 for both high passenger volume short-haul flights and longer, less densely populated routes.

The A310's design incorporates significant advancements over the A300, including a shortened fuselage and redesigned wing, which contribute to its improved aerodynamics and fuel efficiency. It is equipped with either General Electric CF6-80 or Pratt & Whitney JT9D engines, providing a balance of power and efficiency. The A310 has a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 336,000 lbs and a range of up to 4,350 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration. Inside, the A310 offers a comfortable passenger experience with a spacious cabin and advanced features for its time, such as an optional two-crew glass cockpit. This innovative cockpit design reduced the flight crew requirement from three to two, a significant shift in commercial aviation operations.

The Airbus A310 was well-received in the commercial aviation market, with orders from several airlines worldwide. Notable operators included Lufthansa, Air France, and KLM, among others. These airlines utilized the A310 for its intended purpose, taking advantage of its capacity and range for diverse route networks. The A310's production and service history reflect its role in the evolution of Airbus's wide-body offerings. It bridged the gap between the larger A300 and the later A330 and A340 models, demonstrating Airbus's capability to adapt to market needs. The A310 was instrumental in establishing Airbus as a major competitor in the wide-body aircraft segment.

Though production of the A310 has ceased, its legacy continues in the aviation industry. The aircraft is remembered for its contributions to the development of wide-body jets, particularly in terms of efficiency, versatility, and technological advancements in aircraft design.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.