Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 717-200 vs. Boeing 767-300ER

vs.
Compare

717-200

vs.

767-300ER

Price (USD)
$33 Million$105 Million
First Flight
19981986
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
37 m124 ft
54 m180 ft
Wingspan
28 m93 ft
47 m156 ft
Wing Area
93 m²1,001 ft²
283 m²3,049 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m11 ft
5 m16 ft
Height
9 m29 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
55,000 kg121,254 lbs
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce BR715Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211
Max Thrust Per Engine
95 kN21,400 lbf
274 kN61,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
190 kN42,800 lbf
548 kN123,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
16,670 l4,404 gal
90,700 l23,960 gal
Range
3,815 km2,060 nm
11,070 km5,977 nm
Cruise Speed
822 km/h511 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
110 pax261 pax
Max Seating
134 pax351 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 717-200 and Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 717-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 17.10 meters longer than the Boeing 717-200.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 19.10 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 717-200 and Boeing 767-300ER have heights of 9 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 6.80 meters taller.

Boeing 717-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than Boeing 717-200’s range of 3,815 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 7,255 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 19,556 gallons more than the Boeing 717-200’s tank capacity of 4,404 gallons.

Boeing 717-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 151 passengers more than Boeing 717-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 134 passengers of the Boeing 717-200.

About the Boeing 717-200

The Boeing 717-200 is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for regional and short to medium-haul routes. Characterized by its efficiency and operational flexibility, it caters to airlines requiring a reliable and cost-effective solution for less dense routes. Developed as a part of the Boeing family, the 717-200 first entered service in 1998, marking Boeing's entry into the regional jet market. It was produced until 2006, with a focus on meeting the specific demands of regional air travel. The aircraft's production history reflects Boeing's strategy to offer a range of jetliners tailored to various market segments.

With dimensions of 37.8 meters (124.0 feet) in length and a wingspan of 28.5 meters (93.3 feet), the 717-200 is ideally sized for operations at smaller airports. It typically accommodates 110 passengers, providing a comfortable and efficient travel experience on regional journeys. Powered by two rear-mounted Rolls-Royce BR715 engines, the Boeing 717-200 delivers a total thrust of 190.0 kN (42,800 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 16,670 liters (4,404 US gallons) supports a range of 3,815 kilometers (2,060 nautical miles), making it suitable for various regional routes. The aircraft has a cruise speed of 822 km/h (511 mph).

In the competitive regional jet market, the Boeing 717-200 stands as a contender against models like the Bombardier CRJ Series and Embraer E-Jets. Its introduction provided airlines with a practical and economical option for regional networks, balancing the needs for capacity, range, and cost-efficiency. Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, and QantasLink have utilized the 717-200 for its operational efficiency and adaptability. Not many 717s are still in service today. Delta is one of the last airlines to be phasing out its own fleet.

The Boeing 717-200's legacy in commercial aviation is defined by its role in regional air travel. While its production has concluded, the 717-200 continues to be recognized for its contribution to the regional aviation segment.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.