Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

ATR 72-600 vs. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

vs.
Compare

72-600

vs.

DC-9-30

Price (USD)
$26 Million$10 Million
First Flight
19881966
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
27 m89 ft
36 m119 ft
Wingspan
27 m88 ft
28 m93 ft
Wing Area
61 m²656 ft²
93 m²1,001 ft²
Fuselage Width
2 m8 ft
3 m11 ft
Height
7 m25 ft
8 m27 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100Pratt & Whitney JT8D
Max Thrust Per Engine
1,846 kW2,475 shp
67 kN15,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
3,692 kW4,750 shp
134 kN30,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
6,400 l1,691 gal
13,900 l3,672 gal
Range
1,528 km825 nm
2,800 km1,512 nm
Cruise Speed
510 km/h317 mph
897 km/h557 mph
Typical Seating
62 pax115 pax
Max Seating
74 pax127 pax

What Are the Differences Between the ATR 72-600 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

ATR 72-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Size Comparison

  • At 36.40 meters, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 is 9.20 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 28.40 meters, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 is 1.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The ATR 72-600 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 have heights of 7.70 meters and 8.50 meters respectively - making the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 0.80 meters taller.

ATR 72-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Range

  • McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 can fly nonstop approximately 1,272 kilometers further.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 can hold 3,672 gallons of fuel, which is 1,981 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

ATR 72-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 can accommodate 115 passengers, which is about 53 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s max seating capacity is 127 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.