Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A350-1000 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

A350-1000

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$366 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20161988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
73 m242 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
64 m212 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
442 m²4,757 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
6 m19 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
17 m56 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
319,000 kg703,275 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce Trent XWBPratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
432 kN97,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
864 kN194,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
164,000 l43,324 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
16,112 km8,700 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
905 km/h562 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
410 pax62 pax
Max Seating
480 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A350-1000 and ATR 72-600

Airbus A350-1000 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 73.80 meters, the Airbus A350-1000 is 46.60 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 64.80 meters, the Airbus A350-1000 is 37.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A350-1000 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 17.10 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A350-1000 9.40 meters taller.

Airbus A350-1000 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A350-1000’s range of 16,112 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A350-1000 can fly nonstop approximately 14,584 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A350-1000 can hold 43,324 gallons of fuel, which is 41,633 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A350-1000 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A350-1000 can accommodate 410 passengers, which is about 348 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A350-1000’s max seating capacity is 480 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A350-1000

The Airbus A350-1000 is a wide-body, twin-engine jetliner specifically designed for long-haul, high-capacity flights. Launched in 2016, it represents Airbus's commitment to advanced technology, efficiency, and passenger comfort in the competitive long-haul aviation market. It is the larger variant of the A350 (bigger than the -900), and sometimes referred to as the A35K.

Measuring 73.8 meters (242.1 feet) in length with a wingspan of 64.8 meters (212.4 feet), the A350-1000 stands out for its substantial size, accommodating 410 passengers in a standard three-class layout. This capacity enables the aircraft to efficiently serve routes with high passenger volumes, while maintaining the comfort and efficiency standards associated with the A350 family. Equipped with two Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-97 engines, the A350-1000 delivers a total thrust of 864.0 kN (194,000 lbf), facilitating its long-haul capabilities. The aircraft's fuel capacity of 164,000 liters (43,324 US gallons) supports a range of up to 16,112 kilometers (8,700 nautical miles), ideal for extensive long-distance operations. With a cruise speed of 905 km/h (562 mph), the A350-1000 efficiently covers vast distances.

The A350-1000 competes in the commercial aviation market against models such as the Boeing 777X. Its innovative design, which includes extensive use of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer, emphasizes Airbus's focus on sustainability and fuel efficiency. Notable airlines operating the A350-1000 include Qatar Airways, British Airways, and Cathay Pacific. These carriers have employed the aircraft for various long-haul routes, capitalizing on its range, capacity, and passenger appeal. The A350-1000's operational flexibility has made it a valuable asset for airlines looking to enhance their long-haul service offerings. The Airbus A350-1000's development and introduction into the market signify a major step forward in Airbus's long-haul aircraft portfolio. It showcases the manufacturer's ability to innovate and meet the evolving demands of the airline industry, particularly in terms of creating aircraft that balance range, capacity, and environmental considerations.

Today, the Airbus A350-1000 continues to shape the landscape of long-distance air travel. Its role in modern aviation is marked by its combination of advanced technology, operational efficiency, and commitment to sustainable travel, making it a key player in the future of long-haul commercial flights.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.