Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A340-600 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

A340-600

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$275 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20011988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
75 m247 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
63 m208 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
439 m²4,729 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m18 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
17 m58 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
380,000 kg837,757 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
42
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce Trent 500Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
250 kN56,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
1,000 kN224,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
204,500 l54,023 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
14,450 km7,802 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
890 km/h553 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
370 pax62 pax
Max Seating
475 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A340-600 and ATR 72-600

Airbus A340-600 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 75.40 meters, the Airbus A340-600 is 48.20 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 63.50 meters, the Airbus A340-600 is 36.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A340-600 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 17.90 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A340-600 10.20 meters taller.

Airbus A340-600 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A340-600’s range of 14,450 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A340-600 can fly nonstop approximately 12,922 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A340-600 can hold 54,023 gallons of fuel, which is 52,332 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A340-600 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A340-600 can accommodate 370 passengers, which is about 308 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A340-600’s max seating capacity is 475 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A340-600

The Airbus A340-600 is a significant model within the Airbus family, known for its sheer size and quadjet design. As one of the longest passenger aircraft at the time of its introduction, the A340-600 was designed by Airbus to serve long-haul routes, responding to the airline industry's demand for extended range and high-capacity aircraft.

The -600 variant was launched in 2001, and was substantially bigger than other jets in the A340 family. Spanning 247.2 feet (75.4 meters) in length with a wingspan of 208.2 feet (63.5 meters), the A340-600 is distinguishable for its considerable size. The aircraft's design supports a passenger capacity of up to 370 in a standard three-class configuration. The size and design of the A340-600 cater to airlines' needs for higher passenger volumes on long-distance routes. Equipped with four engines, the A340-600 offers a substantial range, making it well-suited for long-haul operations. The aircraft's fuel capacity and engine efficiency contribute to its ability to cover significant distances, facilitating non-stop intercontinental flights. The A340-600's operational capabilities have been a key factor in its selection by airlines for long-range routes.

The A340-600 competes with aircraft like the Boeing 777-300ER in the long-haul, high-capacity market. Its introduction into the aviation market was part of Airbus's strategy to offer diverse aircraft options to airlines, giving an alternative to other long-range models. The A340-600 was even seen as a potential replacement to the Boeing 747-400, as it provided 25% more cargo volume and lower costs per seat. Airlines that have operated the A340-600 include Lufthansa, Virgin Atlantic, Iberia, and South African Airways. Despite the phasing out of production, the Airbus A340-600 remains notable in the history of commercial aviation for its role in long-haul travel. Its development and operational history reflect Airbus's response to the market's evolving needs, showcasing the manufacturer's commitment to addressing the demands of airlines for larger, long-range aircraft.

In retrospect, the Airbus A340-600 represents a specific period in aviation history, where the emphasis on range and passenger capacity led to the development of one of the longest aircraft in commercial service. Its legacy in the industry underscores the continuous evolution of aircraft design and technology to meet the changing demands of global air travel.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.