Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A321XLR vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

A321XLR

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$129 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20221988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
44 m146 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
101,000 kg222,667 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI LEAP-1A / P&W PW1000GPratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
151 kN34,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
302 kN68,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
39,500 l10,435 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
8,704 km4,700 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
832 km/h517 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
220 pax62 pax
Max Seating
244 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A321XLR and ATR 72-600

Airbus A321XLR vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 44.50 meters, the Airbus A321XLR is 17.30 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A321XLR is 8.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A321XLR and ATR 72-600 have heights of 11.80 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A321XLR 4.10 meters taller.

Airbus A321XLR vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A321XLR’s range of 8,704 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A321XLR can fly nonstop approximately 7,176 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A321XLR can hold 10,435 gallons of fuel, which is 8,744 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A321XLR vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A321XLR can accommodate 220 passengers, which is about 158 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A321XLR’s max seating capacity is 244 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A321XLR

The Airbus A321XLR is an extra long range variant of the A321neo. Unveiled at the Paris Air Show in 2019, the A321XLR represents a groundbreaking evolution in narrow-body aircraft for long-haul travel. Boasting an exceptional range of up to 4,700 nautical miles (8,700 kilometers), this is a significant leap from its predecessor, the A321neo. Enhancements in range stem from enhanced fuel capacity and aerodynamic improvements position the XLR as a leading choice for airlines in need of efficient, longer-range single-aisle aircraft. 

The A321XLR's development is a continuation of the A320 family's legacy of innovation, which began with the A320's introduction in the 1980s and expanded with the A321's launch in the 1990s as a stretched variant. As the newest member of this distinguished lineage, the A321XLR has been engineered to deliver unparalleled fuel efficiency and reduced carbon emissions, key factors that align with the aviation industry's escalating focus on sustainability. These advancements are achieved through state-of-the-art engine optimizations and refined aerodynamics, including new wingtip designs.

The introduction of the A321XLR is particularly significant in its ability to transform the dynamics of long-haul travel. Its extended range capability enables it to operate transatlantic routes and other long-haul flights, which were previously the domain of larger twin-aisle aircraft. This feature opens up new possibilities for airlines to explore longer, thinner routes that are not economically viable with larger aircraft, allowing for more direct flights and enhanced route networks. The A321XLR's appeal is evident in its rapidly growing list of global customers, including major airlines such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Qantas, and AirAsia. These operators recognize the A321XLR's potential to revolutionize their fleet capabilities, providing the flexibility to service a wider array of destinations more efficiently and sustainably. The aircraft's unique combination of range, efficiency, and single-aisle economics makes it a strategic asset for airlines looking to expand their reach while minimizing environmental impact.

In essence, the Airbus A321XLR is poised to redefine the parameters of single-aisle long-haul aviation, offering an innovative solution that marries extended range with environmental consciousness and operational efficiency. Its introduction marks a significant milestone in commercial aviation, reflecting a shift towards more versatile, sustainable, and economically viable air travel solutions in the global market.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.