Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A319neo vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

A319neo

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$101 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20211988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
33 m111 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
75,500 kg166,449 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI LEAP-1A / Pratt & Whitney PW1000GPratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
108 kN24,200 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
216 kN48,400 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
26,730 l7,061 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
6,850 km3,699 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
830 km/h516 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
150 pax62 pax
Max Seating
160 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A319neo and ATR 72-600

Airbus A319neo vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 33.80 meters, the Airbus A319neo is 6.60 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A319neo is 8.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A319neo and ATR 72-600 have heights of 11.80 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A319neo 4.10 meters taller.

Airbus A319neo vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A319neo’s range of 6,850 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A319neo can fly nonstop approximately 5,322 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A319neo can hold 7,061 gallons of fuel, which is 5,370 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A319neo vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A319neo can accommodate 150 passengers, which is about 88 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A319neo’s max seating capacity is 160 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A319neo

The Airbus A319neo, part of the Airbus A320neo (New Engine Option) family, is a modernized variant of the classic A319 jetliner. Completing its first passenger flight in 2022, the A319neo was designed to offer enhanced efficiency, reduced environmental impact, and improved performance compared to its predecessor. This development is a response to the growing demand for more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly aircraft in the commercial aviation industry.

Measuring 111 feet (33.8 meters) in length with a wingspan of up to 117.5 feet (35.8 meters) depending on the wingtip configuration, the A319neo retains the compact dimensions of the classic A319. It is optimized to accommodate around 140-160 passengers in a typical two-class layout, catering to the short to medium-haul market segment. The aircraft's size and capacity make it suitable for airlines targeting routes with moderate passenger volumes or operating in airports with space constraints.

The most significant enhancement in the A319neo is its powerplant options – the CFM International LEAP-1A or the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM engines. These advanced engines contribute to a significant reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions, aligning with the aviation industry's environmental goals. The A319neo's maximum takeoff weight is approximately 166,000 lbs, and it boasts an extended range of up to 3,700 nautical miles, providing airlines with greater operational flexibility.

In addition to engine upgrades, the A319neo features aerodynamic improvements, including the option of Sharklet wingtips, which further reduce fuel burn. The aircraft's cabin, known as the Airbus Cabin Flex, offers enhanced passenger comfort, with larger overhead storage compartments and an improved in-flight experience.

Airbus's A319neo has attracted orders from various airlines seeking a modern, efficient, and versatile aircraft for their fleet. The model is particularly appealing to carriers operating in high-cost and environmentally sensitive markets, where the A319neo's efficiencies can lead to significant operational savings and a reduced ecological footprint.

The Airbus A319neo exemplifies the evolution of the A320 family, maintaining the proven qualities of its predecessors while incorporating advanced technologies for a new era of aviation. It represents Airbus's commitment to innovation and sustainability, meeting the current and future needs of the global airline industry.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.