Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A319 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

A319

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$92 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19951988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
33 m111 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
75,500 kg166,449 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56 / IAE V2500Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
120 kN27,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
240 kN54,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
30,190 l7,975 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
6,950 km3,753 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
830 km/h516 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
140 pax62 pax
Max Seating
156 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A319 and ATR 72-600

Airbus A319 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 33.80 meters, the Airbus A319 is 6.60 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A319 is 8.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A319 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 11.80 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A319 4.10 meters taller.

Airbus A319 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A319’s range of 6,950 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A319 can fly nonstop approximately 5,422 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A319 can hold 7,975 gallons of fuel, which is 6,284 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A319 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A319 can accommodate 140 passengers, which is about 78 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A319’s max seating capacity is 156 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A319

The Airbus A319, a member of the renowned Airbus A320 family, is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for short to medium-haul routes. Launched in the mid-1990s, the A319 was developed as a shorter variant of the A320, offering airlines a versatile aircraft for routes with lower passenger demand, without sacrificing range and efficiency.

With a length of 111 feet (33.8 meters) and a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A319 is more compact than the A320, allowing for greater flexibility in airport operations, particularly in constrained or noise-sensitive environments. The aircraft typically accommodates around 140 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, though it can be configured for up to 160 passengers in a high-density layout. Powered by either CFM56-5B or IAE V2500 engines, the A319 delivers efficient performance, supporting a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 166,000 lbs. The aircraft's range extends up to 3,750 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration, allowing for considerable route flexibility, including transcontinental operations. The A319 shares the same pioneering technology as its A320 family counterparts, including Airbus's fly-by-wire control system and an advanced glass cockpit. These features not only enhance operational efficiency and safety but also ensure commonality across the A320 family, reducing training and maintenance costs for airlines.

Airlines around the world have incorporated the Airbus A319 into their fleets, valuing its combination of efficiency, capacity, and range. Operators such as EasyJet, American Airlines, and Lufthansa have deployed the A319 across a wide spectrum of routes, taking advantage of its ability to efficiently serve both short-haul and longer regional operations. The Airbus A319's introduction to the market underscored Airbus's commitment to providing a diverse range of aircraft to meet various airline needs. Its role in the A320 family is characterized by its ability to offer the same advanced technology and performance in a smaller, more versatile package.

The A319 continues to be a significant player in the narrow-body aircraft market, demonstrating its ongoing relevance in the commercial aviation industry. Its versatility and efficiency make it a valuable asset for airlines seeking to optimize their operations and provide quality air travel experiences.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.