Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A310 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

A310

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$60 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19821988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
46 m152 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
43 m144 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
219 m²2,357 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m18 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
157,000 kg346,126 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney PW4000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
262 kN59,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
524 kN118,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
61,070 l16,133 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
8,050 km4,347 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
220 pax62 pax
Max Seating
230 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A310 and ATR 72-600

Airbus A310 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 46.60 meters, the Airbus A310 is 19.40 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 43.90 meters, the Airbus A310 is 16.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A310 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 15.80 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A310 8.10 meters taller.

Airbus A310 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A310’s range of 8,050 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A310 can fly nonstop approximately 6,522 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A310 can hold 16,133 gallons of fuel, which is 14,442 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A310 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A310 can accommodate 220 passengers, which is about 158 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A310’s max seating capacity is 230 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A310

The Airbus A310 is a wide-body, twin-engine jetliner developed by Airbus in the early 1980s as a smaller variant of the A300, its first airliner. The A310 was designed to meet the demands of airlines for a smaller, more efficient aircraft for medium to long-haul routes. This development marked Airbus's expansion in the wide-body aircraft market, offering a versatile option for various airline operations.

With a length of 153 feet (46.7 meters) and a wingspan of 144 feet (43.9 meters), the A310 is notably smaller than the A300, making it suitable for routes with lower passenger demand. The aircraft typically accommodates around 220 passengers in a standard three-class configuration, though it can be configured to carry more in a high-density layout. This flexibility in seating allows airlines to optimize the A310 for both high passenger volume short-haul flights and longer, less densely populated routes.

The A310's design incorporates significant advancements over the A300, including a shortened fuselage and redesigned wing, which contribute to its improved aerodynamics and fuel efficiency. It is equipped with either General Electric CF6-80 or Pratt & Whitney JT9D engines, providing a balance of power and efficiency. The A310 has a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 336,000 lbs and a range of up to 4,350 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration. Inside, the A310 offers a comfortable passenger experience with a spacious cabin and advanced features for its time, such as an optional two-crew glass cockpit. This innovative cockpit design reduced the flight crew requirement from three to two, a significant shift in commercial aviation operations.

The Airbus A310 was well-received in the commercial aviation market, with orders from several airlines worldwide. Notable operators included Lufthansa, Air France, and KLM, among others. These airlines utilized the A310 for its intended purpose, taking advantage of its capacity and range for diverse route networks. The A310's production and service history reflect its role in the evolution of Airbus's wide-body offerings. It bridged the gap between the larger A300 and the later A330 and A340 models, demonstrating Airbus's capability to adapt to market needs. The A310 was instrumental in establishing Airbus as a major competitor in the wide-body aircraft segment.

Though production of the A310 has ceased, its legacy continues in the aviation industry. The aircraft is remembered for its contributions to the development of wide-body jets, particularly in terms of efficiency, versatility, and technological advancements in aircraft design.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.