Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A220-300 vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

A220-300

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$91 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20151988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
38 m127 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
35 m115 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
112 m²1,208 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m11 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m37 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
71,900 kg158,513 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW1500GPratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
103 kN23,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
207 kN46,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
21,510 l5,682 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
6,297 km3,400 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
870 km/h541 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
150 pax62 pax
Max Seating
160 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A220-300 and ATR 72-600

Airbus A220-300 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 38.70 meters, the Airbus A220-300 is 11.50 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 35.10 meters, the Airbus A220-300 is 8 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A220-300 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 11.50 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Airbus A220-300 3.80 meters taller.

Airbus A220-300 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Airbus A220-300’s range of 6,297 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A220-300 can fly nonstop approximately 4,769 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A220-300 can hold 5,682 gallons of fuel, which is 3,991 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Airbus A220-300 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A220-300 can accommodate 150 passengers, which is about 88 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A220-300’s max seating capacity is 160 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Airbus A220-300

The Airbus A220-300, an evolution of the A220-100 and initially known as the Bombardier CS300, is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner. It was designed to cater to the medium-range, single-aisle market segment. The A220-300, with its first flight in 2015, entered commercial service in 2016. It represents an expansion of the A220 aircraft family, offering enhanced capacity and range compared to its predecessor.

Featuring a length of 126.9 feet (38.7 meters) and a wingspan of 115.2 feet (35.1 meters), the A220-300 is slightly larger than the A220-100, accommodating up to 160 passengers in a standard two-class configuration. This increase in size allows airlines to serve higher passenger volumes on similar route profiles as the A220-100. Like its predecessor, the A220-300 is constructed using advanced materials, primarily composites, and innovative aluminum-lithium alloys, contributing to a lighter overall structure. This design approach results in enhanced fuel efficiency and reduced operational costs. The aircraft is powered by Pratt & Whitney PW1500G turbofan engines, delivering a thrust of up to 46,000 lbf, which supports a maximum takeoff weight of around 146,000 lbs. The A220-300's range extends to approximately 3,400 nautical miles, making it suitable for a broad spectrum of regional and medium-haul routes. The A220-300's cabin design focuses on passenger comfort, offering a wider seat and aisle configuration compared to many other aircraft in its class. The advanced avionics and Airbus's fly-by-wire system featured in the cockpit align the A220-300 with modern technological standards in aviation.

Airlines worldwide have incorporated the A220-300 into their fleets, valuing its balance of size, range, and efficiency. Operators such as AirBaltic, which was the launch customer, have utilized the aircraft for its flexibility, deploying it on diverse route networks that encompass both short and medium-haul operations. The Airbus A220-300's role in the commercial aviation market is underscored by its adaptation to current airline requirements. It offers an alternative to larger narrow-body aircraft, providing airlines with a versatile option for varying passenger demand and route structures.

As the aviation industry continues to evolve, the A220-300 stands as a testament to the ongoing shift towards more efficient, versatile aircraft. Its presence in the fleets of global airlines reflects the industry's focus on operational efficiency, passenger comfort, and environmental considerations.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.