Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 787-10 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

787-10

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$306 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20171988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
68 m224 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
60 m197 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
377 m²4,058 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m18 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
17 m55 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
254,000 kg559,974 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric GEnx / Rolls-Royce Trent 1000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
340 kN76,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
680 kN152,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
126,370 l33,383 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
11,910 km6,431 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
903 km/h561 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
330 pax62 pax
Max Seating
440 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 787-10 and ATR 72-600

Boeing 787-10 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 68.30 meters, the Boeing 787-10 is 41.10 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 60.10 meters, the Boeing 787-10 is 33 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 787-10 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 17 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 787-10 9.30 meters taller.

Boeing 787-10 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 787-10’s range of 11,910 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 787-10 can fly nonstop approximately 10,382 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 787-10 can hold 33,383 gallons of fuel, which is 31,692 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 787-10 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 787-10 can accommodate 330 passengers, which is about 268 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 787-10’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 787-10

The Boeing 787-10 is a wide-body, twin-engine jet airliner designed for medium to long-haul routes. First flown in 2017, the 787-10 is an extension of the Dreamliner series, offering increased capacity and range to meet the evolving needs of the aviation industry.

Measuring 68.3 meters (224.0 feet) in length, the 787-10 is considerably longer than its predecessors, the 787-8 and 787-9. It retains the same wingspan of 60.1 meters (197.2 feet) and wing area of 377.0 square meters (4058.0 square feet). The aircraft's design includes the use of composite materials, which contribute to its lightweight structure and improved fuel efficiency compared to traditional aluminum designs. The 787-10 has two engine options: the General Electric GEnx or the Rolls-Royce Trent 1000. These powerplants produce a total maximum thrust of 680.0 kN (152,000 lbf). Combined with highly innovative aerodynamic design, the -10 can achieve a max range of approximately 6,431 nautical miles (11,910 kilometers).

The 787-10's cabin is designed to accommodate around 330 passengers in a standard three-class layout. In economy, seats are up to 9 abreast, with a 3-3-3 configuration. The aircraft features a passenger-friendly cabin environment with larger windows, improved air quality, and advanced in-flight entertainment systems.

In the commercial aviation market, the Boeing 787-10 has similar capacity to the Airbus A350-900 and Boeing 777-200ER. Its introduction provided airlines with an aircraft that combines operational efficiency with the capacity to serve high-demand routes effectively. In May of 2013, Singapore Airlines became the launch customer, stating they would order 30 787-10s. Other airlines that have included the Boeing 787-10 in their fleets include Singapore Airlines, United Airlines, and Etihad Airways. These carriers utilize the aircraft's capabilities to efficiently serve a mix of international and transcontinental routes.

In summary, the Boeing 787-10 represents a significant development in the Dreamliner series, offering enhanced capabilities in terms of passenger capacity and range. Its design and technological advancements reflect an evolution in long-haul air travel, providing airlines with a versatile and efficient aircraft for their long-range operations. The first -10 was delivered to Singapore Airlines on March 25, 2018. Today, major airlines like United and Air Canada continue to place orders for the 787-10. As older 777-200ERs continue to be retired, airlines may find the 787-10 to be an optimal replacement aircraft.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.