Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 777-300ER vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

777-300ER

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$340 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20031988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
73 m242 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
64 m212 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
436 m²4,701 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
6 m20 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
18 m60 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
351,530 kg774,991 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric GE90Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
513 kN115,300 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
1,026 kN230,600 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
181,290 l47,892 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
13,650 km7,370 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
892 km/h554 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
396 pax62 pax
Max Seating
440 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 777-300ER and ATR 72-600

Boeing 777-300ER vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 73.90 meters, the Boeing 777-300ER is 46.70 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 64.80 meters, the Boeing 777-300ER is 37.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 777-300ER and ATR 72-600 have heights of 18.50 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 777-300ER 10.80 meters taller.

Boeing 777-300ER vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 777-300ER’s range of 13,650 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 777-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 12,122 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 777-300ER can hold 47,892 gallons of fuel, which is 46,201 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 777-300ER vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 777-300ER can accommodate 396 passengers, which is about 334 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 777-300ER’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 777-300ER

Introduced in 2003, the Boeing 777-300ER is a large twin-aisle aircraft designed for high capacity, long haul flights. As an extended-range variant of the 777-300, this wide-body twinjet was designed to meet the complex requirements of airlines for more passengers and range, particularly for international routes.

The 777-300ER, with its impressive length of 73.9 meters (242.5 feet) and a wingspan of 64.8 meters (212.6 feet), is a marvel of modern aviation design. The aircraft's wing area of 436.8 square meters (4701.7 square feet) plays a crucial role in its aerodynamic efficiency, enabling it to operate effectively over long distances. Equipped with two high-thrust GE90-115B turbofan engines, the 777-300ER boasts a total maximum thrust of 1026.0 kN (230,600 lbf), facilitating a significant range of up to 13,650 kilometers (7,370 nautical miles). Inside, the Boeing 777-300ER can typically seat 396 passengers in a standard three-class layout.

The 777-300ER's entry into service was a strategic move by Boeing to capture a significant share of the long-haul market. It competes closely with other aircraft like the Airbus A330-900, A340-600, and A350-1000, offering airlines a combination of efficiency, capacity, and range. The 777-300ER also succeeded many 747-400s, being about 20% more efficient than the Queen of the Skies in terms of fuel burn. Notable operators of the 777-300ER include Emirates, Cathay Pacific, Turkish Airlines, Thai Airways, and Air France. All of these carriers have utilized the aircraft's capabilities to serve a diverse range of long-haul routes effectively.

Boeing's focus in developing the 777-300ER was not only on enhancing passenger comfort and range but also on improving operational efficiency. The aircraft's use of advanced materials, coupled with its innovative design, results in lower operating costs and a reduced environmental impact, aligning with the growing emphasis on sustainable aviation.

In conclusion, the Boeing 777-300ER represents a significant achievement in aircraft design and engineering. Its combination of range, passenger capacity, and efficiency has set new standards in long-haul commercial air travel, making it a key player in the wide-body aircraft market. The -300ER variant stands as the most popular 777. By 2020, the best-seller had a total of 837 orders and 832 deliveries. Looking ahead, many 777 operators will opt for the new 777X when their fleets head towards retirement.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.