Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-400ER vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

767-400ER

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$115 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20001988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
61 m201 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
51 m170 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
290 m²3,129 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
16 m55 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
204,100 kg449,963 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney 4000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
270 kN60,600 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
540 kN121,200 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
10,400 km5,616 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
296 pax62 pax
Max Seating
375 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-400ER and ATR 72-600

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 61.40 meters, the Boeing 767-400ER is 34.20 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 51.90 meters, the Boeing 767-400ER is 24.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER and ATR 72-600 have heights of 16.90 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-400ER 9.20 meters taller.

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 767-400ER’s range of 10,400 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-400ER can fly nonstop approximately 8,872 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 22,269 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-400ER can accommodate 296 passengers, which is about 234 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER’s max seating capacity is 375 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 767-400ER

The Boeing 767-400ER is an advanced, wide-body aircraft developed by Boeing as part of the evolution of the 767. Introduced at the beginning of the 21st century, this variant is an extension of the popular 767 family, designed to address the increasing demands of the airline industry for higher capacity and extended range.

As a later addition to the 767 series, the -400ER variant built upon the established reputation of its predecessors by offering enhancements in both size and performance. The development and subsequent introduction of this model into the commercial market were part of Boeing's strategic response to the competitive dynamics of the aviation industry. The 767-400ER's production started in the late 1990s, with the aim of providing airlines with an aircraft that combined operational efficiency with increased passenger capacity.

The aircraft measures 61.4 meters (201.3 feet) in length, featuring an extended fuselage to accommodate more passengers. The wingspan of the 767-400ER is 51.9 meters (170.3 feet), and it has a wing area of 290.7 square meters (3129.1 square feet). These dimensions contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic efficiency, particularly important for long-distance travel. Equipped with a choice of General Electric CF6 or Pratt & Whitney 4000 series engines, the 767-400ER offers robust performance with a total maximum thrust of 540.0 kN (121,200 lbf). This thrust capacity, combined with a fuel storage of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), enables the aircraft to cover a range of about 10,400 kilometers (5,616 nautical miles), making it well-suited for extended-range operations.

In terms of passenger capacity, the typical layout of the 767-400ER seats up to 296 passengers, with a maximum capacity of 375 passengers in a high-density configuration. The cabin is generally arranged in a dual-class setup, featuring a standard 7 abreast, 2-3-2 seat arrangement in economy class.

Competing with the Airbus A330-200, the 767-400ER was introduced to provide airlines with a modernized option of the 767, balancing the familiar operational characteristics of its predecessors with the needs of contemporary long-haul travel. Notable airlines of the Boeing 767-400ER include Continental (United Airlines) and Delta Air Lines. The aircraft's combination of extended fuselage, increased passenger capacity, and range efficiency mark it as a significant evolution within the 767 family, catering to the specific requirements of modern commercial aviation. Only 37 units of the -400ER were ever produced.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.