Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-200ER vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

767-200ER

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$89 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19841988
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
48 m159 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
179,200 kg395,068 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
P&W PW4000, JT8D / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
270 kN60,600 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
540 kN121,200 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
91,380 l24,140 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
12,200 km6,587 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
216 pax62 pax
Max Seating
290 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-200ER and ATR 72-600

Boeing 767-200ER vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 48.50 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 21.30 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 20.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER and ATR 72-600 have heights of 15.80 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-200ER 8.10 meters taller.

Boeing 767-200ER vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 767-200ER’s range of 12,200 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-200ER can fly nonstop approximately 10,672 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER can hold 24,140 gallons of fuel, which is 22,449 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 767-200ER vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-200ER can accommodate 216 passengers, which is about 154 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER’s max seating capacity is 290 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 767-200ER

Introduced in 1984, the Boeing 767-200ER (Extended Range) is a twin engine, wide-body commercial aircraft that represents an advanced variant of the original 767-200. This updated version was designed to offer enhanced range and capacity in the long-haul market. The -200ER spearheaded the growth of Transatlantic twinjet flights under Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards (ETOPS) regulations.

The 767-200ER features a length of 48.5 meters (159.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet). With a wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet), the aircraft is engineered to provide a balance of aerodynamic efficiency and structural capability, accommodating long-range flights with a substantial payload. One of the distinctive aspects of the 767-200ER is its extended range capability, with a total fuel capacity of 91,380 liters (24,140 US gallons), facilitating a range of up to 12,200 kilometers (6,587 nautical miles). This extended range makes the aircraft particularly suited for intercontinental routes, allowing airlines to operate non-stop flights over longer distances. The aircraft is powered by a choice of high-thrust engines from manufacturers like Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce. These engines provide a total maximum thrust of 540.0 kN (121,200 lbf), contributing to the 767-200ER's performance in extended-range operations.

In terms of passenger capacity, the 767-200ER typically accommodates around 216 passengers in a dual-class configuration. This layout often includes a business class with more spacious seating and a larger economy class in a twin-aisle, 2-3-2 arrangement. The maximum capacity of the aircraft can reach up to 290 passengers, depending on the airline's specific configuration. Competing in the market against other wide-body aircraft such as the Airbus A300 and A310, the 767-200ER carved out a niche for itself in the long-haul segment. Its introduction was timely, aligning with the increasing globalization of air travel and the need for more efficient, long-range aircraft. Notable airlines that have operated the Boeing 767-200ER include Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

In summary, the Boeing 767-200ER stands as a significant development in Boeing's 767 series, offering airlines a combination of extended range, capacity, and operational efficiency. Beyond its use for passenger flights, the 767 has been an important aircraft for both freight and military operations.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.