Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-200 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

757-200

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$73 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19821988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
47 m155 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
115,700 kg255,075 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
179 kN40,200 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
358 kN80,400 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
43,490 l11,489 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
7,250 km3,915 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
200 pax62 pax
Max Seating
239 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-200 and ATR 72-600

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 47.30 meters, the Boeing 757-200 is 20.10 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 38 meters, the Boeing 757-200 is 10.90 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-200 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 13.60 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 757-200 5.90 meters taller.

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 757-200’s range of 7,250 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 757-200 can fly nonstop approximately 5,722 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 757-200 can hold 11,489 gallons of fuel, which is 9,798 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 757-200 can accommodate 200 passengers, which is about 138 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 757-200’s max seating capacity is 239 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 757-200

The Boeing 757-200, classified as a narrow-body commercial airliner targeting the medium to long-range flight market. Production commenced in the early 1980s, with the first units entering service in 1982. Over the years, the Boeing 757-200 (abbreviated as B752) gained traction in commercial aviation, being used in a variety of roles ranging from busy shuttle services to transatlantic routes. When it comes to international use of the 757-200, carriers most commonly utilize the type for transatlantic routes between the US and Europe. The -200 is particularly advantageous for serving destinations where passenger volumes are insufficient for wide-body aircraft. The -200 is the original version of the 757, with the updated and enlarged -300 entering service in 1999.

The 757-200's dimensions include a length of 47.3 meters (155.2 feet) and a wingspan of 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), coupled with a wing area of 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet). The aircraft's propulsion system, consisting of engines capable of a maximum thrust of 358.0 kN (80,400 lbf), supports a range of approximately 7,250 kilometers (3,915 nautical miles), making it suitable for both domestic and international routes. In terms of seating capacity, the Boeing 757-200 can typically accommodate around 200 passengers in a standard configuration, with the possibility of seating up to 239 passengers. This flexibility in cabin layout allowed airlines to optimize the aircraft for various service requirements.

The Boeing 757-200's main competitors in the market is the Airbus A321. These aircraft offered similar capabilities in terms of range and passenger capacity, leading to a competitive landscape in the medium-haul market segment. The newer A321neo and Boeing 737 MAX 9 are expected to replace 757-200s as they are moved into retirement. Prominent airlines that have operated the Boeing 757-200 include Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and British Airways. These carriers utilized the 757-200 extensively for its operational flexibility, allowing them to serve a wide range of routes effectively.

As a product of its time, the Boeing 757-200 embodied the technological and design philosophies of the era, catering to the specific demands of medium to long-haul air travel. Its widespread use by various airlines underscores its alignment with the operational needs of the commercial aviation industry during its production and operational tenure.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.