Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900ER vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

737-900ER

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$102 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20061988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
126 kN28,400 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
252 kN56,800 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
29,700 l7,846 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
5,900 km3,186 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
180 pax62 pax
Max Seating
215 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900ER and ATR 72-600

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 14.90 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 7.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER and ATR 72-600 have heights of 12.60 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 4.90 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 4,372 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 6,155 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 118 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.