Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900 vs. ATR 72-600

vs.
Compare

737-900

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$102 Million$26 Million
First Flight
20001988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
79,000 kg174,165 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
121 kN27,300 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
242 kN54,600 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
26,000 l6,868 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
5,100 km2,754 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
177 pax62 pax
Max Seating
189 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900 and ATR 72-600

Boeing 737-900 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900 is 14.90 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900 is 7.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 12.60 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900 4.90 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-900’s range of 5,100 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900 can fly nonstop approximately 3,572 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900 can hold 6,868 gallons of fuel, which is 5,177 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 737-900 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900 can accommodate 177 passengers, which is about 115 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900’s max seating capacity is 189 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 737-900

The Boeing 737-900, a member of the 737 Next Generation (NG) series, was introduced in the year 2000 as a response to airline demand for an aircraft with higher capacity within the narrow-body market. This B739 model, part of Boeing's continuous innovation in the 737 series, was designed to provide an efficient solution for medium to long-range flights.

At 138.1 feet (42.1 meters) in length and 112.6 feet (34.3 meters) in wingspan, the 737-900 is notable for its extended fuselage, allowing for an increased passenger capacity. It typically accommodates 177 passengers in a two-class layout, with an economy class configured in a 6 abreast seat arrangement. The aircraft's interior design focuses on passenger comfort and space utilization, adapting to the requirements of both airlines and passengers. The 737-900 is equipped with two CFM International CFM56-7B27 engines, resulting in a combined thrust of 54,600 lbf (242.0 kN). Along with a fuel capacity of 6,868 US gallons (26,000 liters), the aircraft has a range of approximately 2,753 nautical miles (5,100 kilometers).

In its segment, the Boeing 737-900 competes with similar aircraft like the Airbus A321. Its introduction to the market was part of Boeing's strategy to expand the capabilities of the 737 family, addressing the evolving needs of the airline industry for larger single-aisle aircraft. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, United Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and Korean Air have incorporated the Boeing 737-900 into their fleets. These carriers favor the -900 for its versatility, as it can operate both domestic and international routes. With the more recent MAX family of 737s in production, the many -900s will be replaced by the 737 MAX 9. Currently, the average age of a -900 is approximately 20 years. Many airlines have started ordering the newer MAX 9 in preparation for retirement of the older 739.

The Boeing 737-900's production history and widespread use among airlines signify its role in the development of modern air travel. While it shares commonalities with other models in the 737 NG series, its distinct capacity and range set it apart, highlighting Boeing's adaptability in responding to market trends and airline requirements.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.