Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-800 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

737-800

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$96 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19971988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
39 m129 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
79,000 kg174,165 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
121 kN27,300 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
242 kN54,600 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
26,000 l6,868 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
5,400 km2,916 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
160 pax62 pax
Max Seating
189 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-800 and ATR 72-600

Boeing 737-800 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 39.50 meters, the Boeing 737-800 is 12.30 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-800 is 7.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-800 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 12.60 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-800 4.90 meters taller.

Boeing 737-800 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-800’s range of 5,400 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-800 can fly nonstop approximately 3,872 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-800 can hold 6,868 gallons of fuel, which is 5,177 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 737-800 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-800 can accommodate 160 passengers, which is about 98 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-800’s max seating capacity is 189 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 737-800

The Boeing 737-800 is a narrow-body jetliner for medium-range flights. A member of the 737 Next Generation series, the -800 was introduced to airlines in 1997. It is the most popular variant of the NG series, with 4,991 having been delivered to the commercial market. Furthermore, it is currently the most popular narrow-body model in the skies today. As the B738 gets older, many airlines will eventually be replacing them with the newer 737 MAX 8.

Boasting a wingspan of 112.6 feet (34.3 meters) and reaching a length of 129.6 feet (39.5 meters), the 737-800 is adept at navigating diverse airport types, from bustling international hubs to regional airports. The aircraft's unique blend of size and performance made it a favorable choice for airlines seeking operational efficiency and passenger comfort.

Under the wings of the 737-800, you'll find two CFM International CFM56-7B27 engines, each offering a thrust of 27,300 lbf (121.0 kN), culminating in a combined thrust of 54,600 lbf (242.0 kN). These engines, renowned for their reliability and efficiency, propel the aircraft to a maximum range of approximately 2,935 nautical miles (5,436 kilometers), a testament to its prowess in medium-haul travel.

The cabin of the 737-800, known for its versatility, typically accommodates 162 passengers in a dual-class layout. The economy class often features a 3-3 seat arrangement, providing a comfortable and accessible experience for passengers. The aircraft's interior also showcases advanced features like redesigned overhead bins and modernized aesthetics, enhancing the overall passenger experience.

In its market segment, the Boeing 737-800 competes with the likes of the Airbus A320 series. Its launch marked a significant milestone for Boeing, as it expanded the 737 family to meet the evolving demands of the airline industry, particularly in terms of range and capacity. Global airlines such as Qantas, Turkish Airlines, and Southwest Airlines have made the 737-800 a staple in their fleets. The aircraft's adaptability has allowed these carriers to efficiently serve a mix of short to medium-haul routes, proving its worth as a versatile and reliable workhorse.

The Boeing 737-800’s enduring presence in global aviation highlights its impact on air travel, particularly in streamlining operations for medium-range routes. Its legacy lies not just in its operational success, but also in its contribution to advancing the standards of efficiency and comfort in the narrow-body aircraft category.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.