Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-400 vs. ATR 72-600

Compare

737-400

vs.

72-600

Price (USD)
$50 Million$26 Million
First Flight
19881988
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
27 m89 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
27 m88 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
61 m²656 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
7 m25 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
68,000 kg149,914 lbs
23,000 kg50,706 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
1,846 kW2,475 shp
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
3,692 kW4,750 shp
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
6,400 l1,691 gal
Range
3,850 km2,079 nm
1,528 km825 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
510 km/h317 mph
Typical Seating
144 pax62 pax
Max Seating
188 pax74 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-400 and ATR 72-600

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 72-600 Size Comparison

  • At 36.50 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 9.30 meters longer than the ATR 72-600.
  • With a wingspan of 28.80 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 1.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-400 and ATR 72-600 have heights of 11.10 meters and 7.70 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-400 3.40 meters taller.

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 72-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-400’s range of 3,850 kilometers is greater than ATR 72-600’s range of 1,528 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-400 can fly nonstop approximately 2,322 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-400 can hold 5,310 gallons of fuel, which is 3,619 gallons more than the ATR 72-600’s tank capacity of 1,691 gallons.

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 72-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-400 can accommodate 144 passengers, which is about 82 passengers more than ATR 72-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-400’s max seating capacity is 188 passengers, compared to 74 passengers of the ATR 72-600.

About the Boeing 737-400

The Boeing 737-400, part of the 737 Classic series, is a narrow-body, twin-engine airliner developed to meet the evolving requirements of the short to medium-haul market. First introduced in 1988, the 737-400 expanded upon the success of its predecessor, the 737-300. The -400 variant entered manufacturing shortly after finalization of design plans between Boeing and launch customer Piedmont Airlines (later merged into US Airways). It gives increased capacity and range, offering an option in between Boeing's 737-300 and the 757-200.

The fuselage incorporated a key 8 foot expansion to enable typical accommodation for up to 170 passengers in a 2-class layout. Other changes included increased weights and structural reinforcements, enhanced avionics/flight controls, and higher thrust CFM powerplants required for the heavier max takeoff figures. Cost efficiencies were achieved keeping cockpit continuity with the ubiquitous 737 flight deck suite.

Spanning 119.6 feet (36.5 meters) in length with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters), the 737-400 was designed to accommodate the growing demand for larger single-aisle aircraft. The aircraft typically seats 144 passengers, providing more space and comfort compared to earlier models in the series. This increased capacity made the 737-400 an attractive option for airlines seeking to transport more passengers on popular routes, without the need for a larger, wide-body aircraft. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3C1 engines, the 737-400 delivers a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This engine configuration, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), allows the aircraft to achieve a range of 2,079 nautical miles (3,850 kilometers).

In the competitive commercial aviation market of its time, the Boeing 737-400 contended with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series. Its introduction marked another milestone for Boeing in the evolution of the 737 family, solidifying the company's position in the market for short to medium-haul airliners. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and British Airways incorporated the Boeing 737-400 into their fleets. The aircraft's operational role was significant, enabling these carriers to expand their route networks and increase flight frequencies, particularly in domestic and regional markets.

About the ATR 72-600

The ATR 72-600, part of the renowned ATR aircraft family, is a twin-engine, high-wing turboprop airliner designed primarily for regional and short-haul flights. First flown in 1988, this model has become a popular choice for airlines operating in small markets.

ATR, the manufacturer of the ATR 72, has produced over 1800 units through 2023. The -600 variant is the latest model to be designed, making its first flight in 2007. Compared to the smaller ATR 42, the ATR 72 has a longer fuselage and wider wingspan. At 27.2 meters (89.1 feet) from nose to tail and a width of 27.1 meters (88.7 feet), the ATR 72-600 is characterized by its compact and efficient design, suitable for operations at smaller airports. It has a max takeoff weight of 23,000 kg (50,706 lbs), and a max payload of 7,400 kg (16,313 lbs). The ATR 72-600 is powered by two engines, delivering a total output of 3692 kW (4,950 shp), providing reliable performance for its operational requirements. It has a fuel capacity of 6,400 liters (1,691 US gallons), which contributes to its range of 1,528 kilometers (825 nautical miles). With a cruise speed of 510 km/h (317 mph), the ATR 72-600 offers an efficient travel option for regional airlines, connecting smaller communities and cities.

In the regional aviation sector, the ATR 72-600 competes with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400 and Embraer E-Jets. Its advantage lies in its operational cost-effectiveness, making it an appealing choice for airlines serving regional routes with moderate passenger volumes. Airlines such as Air New Zealand, IndiGo, SAS, and TAROM operate the ATR 72-600, utilizing its capabilities to serve regional networks. These carriers value the aircraft for its ability to provide efficient, reliable service on shorter routes, which are crucial for maintaining regional connectivity. The introduction of the ATR 72-600 to the market was driven by the need for an economical, versatile aircraft that could effectively serve the regional aviation segment. Its operational role has been defined by its capacity to offer cost-efficient solutions for airlines operating on less dense routes.

Today, the ATR 72-600 remains a significant player in the regional aircraft market, demonstrating its continued relevance in connecting smaller cities and communities.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.