Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

Mikoyan MiG-31 vs. T-38 Talon

vs.
Compare

MiG-31

vs.

T-38

Role
InterceptorAdvanced Trainer
Generation
No generationNo generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionUnited States
Manufacturer
MikoyanNorthrop
Price (USD)
$33 Million$1 Million
Primary Users
Russian Aerospace ForcesUS Air Force
First Flight
19751959
Last Production Year
19941972
# Units Built
5191,189
Status
In ServiceIn Service
Seats
22
Length
22 m74 ft
14 m46 ft
Wingspan
13 m44 ft
7 m25 ft
Wing Area
61 m²663 ft²
16 m²172 ft²
Height
6 m21 ft
3 m12 ft
Empty Weight
21,820 kg48,105 lbs
3,266 kg7,200 lbs
Gross Weight
41,000 kg90,390 lbs
5,361 kg11,820 lbs
MTOW
46,198 kg101,850 lbs
5,484 kg12,090 lbs
Fuel Capacity
16,125 kg35,550 lbs
1,715 kg3,780 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Type
TurbofanTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
SolovievGeneral Electric
Engine Model
D-30F6J85-5A
Dry Thrust
93 kN21,000 lbs
9 kN2,050 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
152 kN34,000 lbf
13 kN2,900 lbf
Max Thrust
304 kN68,000 lbf
26 kN5,800 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.83Mach 1.30
Top Speed
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
1,381 km/h858 mph
Range
2,134 km1,152 nm
2,111 km1,140 nm
Rate of Climb
288 m/s56,700 ft/min
168 m/s33,000 ft/min
Ceiling
24,994 m82,000 ft
15,240 m50,000 ft
G Limit
5 g7 g

What Are the Differences Between the Mikoyan MiG-31 and T-38 Talon

Mikoyan MiG-31 vs T-38 Talon Size Comparison

  • At 22.60 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 8.50 meters longer than the T-38 Talon.
  • With a wingspan of 13.50 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 5.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 2.60 meters bigger than that of the T-38 Talon’s 3.90 meters.

Mikoyan MiG-31 vs T-38 Talon Price

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 is more expensive than the T-38 Talon, with a unit cost of approximately 33 million compared to the T-38 Talon’s unit cost of approximately 1 million.

Mikoyan MiG-31 vs T-38 Talon Speed

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the T-38 Talon has a top speed of 858 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the Mikoyan MiG-31 1,042 miles per hour faster than the T-38 Talon.

About the Mikoyan MiG-31

The Mikoyan MiG-31 "Foxhound," is a high-speed interceptor aircraft developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It was designed as a successor to the MiG-25, with the primary mission of engaging and destroying enemy aircraft at long ranges and high altitudes. The MiG-31 entered service with the Soviet Air Defense Forces in 1981 and remains one of the fastest combat jets in the world.

Production History: The development of the MiG-31 began in the early 1970s, aiming to address the shortcomings of the MiG-25, particularly in terms of radar technology and overall combat capabilities. The first prototype flew in 1975, leading to the aircraft's introduction into operational service in 1981. Over its production life, which officially ended in 1994, approximately 500 MiG-31s were built.

Design Features: The MiG-31 is distinguished by its large airframe, twin-engine configuration, and advanced Zaslon radar system, which was the first phased-array radar fitted to a fighter aircraft. This radar enables the MiG-31 to detect and engage targets at ranges exceeding 200 kilometers, far beyond visual range. The aircraft is powered by two powerful Soloviev D-30F6 turbofan engines, allowing it to reach speeds up to Mach 2.83.

Operational History: The MiG-31 has primarily served in the air defense role, patrolling the vast borders of the Soviet Union and its successor state, Russia. It has been a vital component of Russia's air defense strategy, capable of intercepting high-speed reconnaissance aircraft, bombers, and cruise missiles. The MiG-31 has not seen combat in major conflicts but has been regularly updated to maintain its relevance against modern threats.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-31 vs. MiG-25

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were designed as high-speed interceptors, but the MiG-31 significantly surpasses the MiG-25 in terms of radar capabilities, engagement range, and multi-target tracking ability. The MiG-31's design improvements allow it to engage low-flying targets effectively, addressing a key limitation of the MiG-25.

Performance: While the MiG-25 set speed and altitude records, the MiG-31 offers better overall performance, including the ability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes, increased endurance, and improved combat effectiveness.

MiG-31 vs. F-22 Raptor

Design Evolution: The F-22 Raptor represents a leap in technology as a fifth-generation fighter, emphasizing stealth, agility, and situational awareness. In contrast, the MiG-31 focuses on high speed, altitude, and long-range detection and engagement, prioritizing a different set of operational requirements.

Operational Capabilities: The F-22 excels in stealth, air superiority, and ground attack roles, making it versatile on the modern battlefield. The MiG-31, however, remains unmatched in its niche as a long-range interceptor, capable of engaging targets at distances where most fighters cannot operate effectively.

About the T-38 Talon

The T-38 Talon is a twin-engine, high-altitude, supersonic jet trainer used primarily by the United States Air Force for pilot training. Developed by Northrop Corporation in the late 1950s, it was the first supersonic training aircraft in the world and has been instrumental in preparing generations of military aviators for fighter and bomber missions.

Production History: The T-38 was introduced in 1961, with production running until 1972. Over this period, more than 1,100 units were produced. The aircraft was designed to offer a cost-effective, high-performance training solution, capable of simulating the flight characteristics of much larger and more expensive fighter jets. It has undergone various upgrades over its service life to enhance its avionics, safety features, and overall performance, ensuring its continued relevance in pilot training.

Design Features: Featuring a sleek, lightweight design, the T-38 can achieve Mach 1.3 thanks to its twin General Electric J85 turbojet engines. Its tandem-seat configuration allows an instructor and a student to be seated in line, with the student pilot typically in the front seat. The T-38's design emphasizes ease of control and stability at supersonic speeds, making it an ideal platform for transitioning pilots to more advanced aircraft.

Operational History: The T-38 has been used extensively for advanced pilot training, including undergraduate pilot training, pilot instructor training, and as a companion trainer for various frontline fighter and bomber aircraft. It has also served in non-training roles, such as a chase aircraft for research and development programs. Its operational history is marked by its adaptability, having been deployed in numerous bases across the United States and abroad.

Comparison with Similar Models:

T-38 Talon vs. Hawk T1

Training Philosophy: Both the T-38 and the Hawk T1 are used for advanced pilot training, but the T-38 is specifically tailored for preparing pilots for high-speed jet operations, emphasizing supersonic flight training.

Technological and Performance Aspects: The T-38's design focuses on simplicity and performance, offering a straightforward, no-frills approach to supersonic training. The Hawk T1, by comparison, includes more modern avionics and can be equipped with weapons for combat training missions.

T-38 Talon vs. Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet

Design Intent and Usage: The T-38 was developed primarily as a trainer with a focus on high-altitude, supersonic flight characteristics. The Alpha Jet, a Franco-German collaboration, was designed to fulfill both training and light attack roles, making it more versatile in terms of operational deployment.

Performance Characteristics: While the Alpha Jet offers a good balance between subsonic and supersonic performance and has seen use as a light attack aircraft, the T-38 specializes in preparing pilots for the demands of flying high-performance, supersonic jets, focusing on the skills needed for air superiority missions.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.