MiG-27 vs. Sukhoi Su-24

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-27, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger-D/J," is a ground-attack aircraft derived from the MiG-23 fighter aircraft, designed and built by the Soviet Union. Introduced in the 1970s, the MiG-27 was specifically optimized for the air-to-ground role, featuring significant modifications to enhance its low-altitude flying capability and survivability over the battlefield.

Production History: The development of the MiG-27 was a direct result of the experience gained from the MiG-23's performance, with a focus on improving its functionality in a dedicated ground-attack role. The MiG-27 entered service in the mid-1970s, with production continuing until 1986. Over 1,000 units were produced, serving in the air forces of the Soviet Union and several other nations.

Design Features: Key design changes from the MiG-23 to the MiG-27 included a redesigned nose to accommodate a ground-attack radar and an optical sight, simpler fixed intakes to replace the variable-geometry intakes, and strengthened landing gear to withstand the rigors of low-altitude operations. The MiG-27's armament was centered around a powerful 6-barrel rotary 30mm cannon, with hardpoints for a variety of bombs, rockets, and missiles tailored for ground-attack missions.

Operational History: The MiG-27 played a significant role in several regional conflicts, most notably in the Soviet–Afghan War, where it was used extensively for close air support and interdiction missions. Its service life extended into the 21st century with several air forces, demonstrating its durability and effectiveness in combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-27 vs. Su-25

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-27 and the Su-25 were designed for close air support and ground-attack missions. While the MiG-27 was adapted from a fighter design and retained some air-to-air capabilities, the Su-25 was purpose-built as a ground-attack aircraft.

Performance: The Su-25 offers superior survivability in a ground-attack role due to its armored cockpit and redundancy in critical systems. The MiG-27, however, benefits from higher speeds and flexibility offered by its variable-geometry wings, allowing for quick ingress and egress from the target area.

MiG-27 vs. A-10 Thunderbolt II

Design Evolution: The A-10 Thunderbolt II and the MiG-27 were developed around the same time, with both aircraft focusing on close air support and combat survivability. The A-10 was designed around its powerful GAU-8 Avenger rotary cannon, with an emphasis on loiter capability and battlefield survivability.

Operational Capabilities: While the A-10 is renowned for its tank-killing capabilities, particularly with its armor-piercing ammunition, the MiG-27 offered a broader range of weapons for engaging both soft and hard targets.

The Sukhoi Su-24 "Fencer" is a supersonic attack aircraft developed by the Soviet Union and introduced into service in the late 1970s. Designed primarily for deep strike missions, the Su-24 has a variable-sweep wing design that enables it to perform at high speeds at low altitudes. Its robust avionics suite allows for precision strikes in all weather conditions, making it a key asset for the Russian Air Force and other countries.

Production History: Development of the Su-24 began in the late 1960s, with the goal of replacing older Soviet bombers with a more versatile and capable platform. The aircraft entered service in 1974, with production continuing until 1993. Over this period, approximately 1,400 Su-24s were produced.

Design Features: The Su-24's most distinctive feature is its variable-sweep wing, which allows the aircraft to optimize performance across a broad range of speeds and mission profiles. Powered by two afterburning turbojet engines, it can reach speeds of up to Mach 1.35. The "Fencer" is equipped with a sophisticated navigation and attack system that integrates terrain-following radar and laser-guided bombs, allowing it to conduct precision strikes under adverse weather.

Operational History: The Su-24 has seen extensive operational use in various conflicts since its introduction, including in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Syria, and Ukraine. Its ability to deliver precision strikes in all weather conditions has proven invaluable in supporting ground operations and achieving air superiority. Despite its age, the Su-24 remains in service with a few air forces, undergoing upgrades to extend its operational life and combat effectiveness.

Comparison with Similar Models:

Su-24 "Fencer" vs. Panavia Tornado

Mission Flexibility: Both aircraft were designed for low-level, high-speed penetration and precision strike missions. While the Tornado features a similar variable-sweep wing design for versatility, it has been deployed more extensively in NATO operations, benefiting from joint development by Italy, the UK, and Germany.

Avionics and Weapons Systems: The Su-24's avionics and targeting systems were pioneering for their time, but the Tornado has seen more extensive modernization in Western air forces, incorporating newer technology and precision-guided munitions for a broader range of missions.

Su-24 "Fencer" vs. F-111 Aardvark

Design Philosophy and Capabilities: The Su-24 and the F-111 share a similar design philosophy, focusing on deep penetration strike capabilities. The F-111, serving primarily with the United States Air Force, featured a greater emphasis on electronic warfare and strategic bombing roles.

Operational Use and Legacy: While the F-111 was retired from service in the early 21st century, the Su-24 continues to operate in several air forces, with ongoing upgrades keeping it relevant. Both aircraft have left a legacy in terms of their all-weather, long-range strike capabilities.