Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

MiG-25 vs. T-38 Talon

Compare

MiG-25

vs.

T-38

Role
InterceptorAdvanced Trainer
Generation
3rd generationNo generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionUnited States
Manufacturer
Mikoyan-GurevichNorthrop
Price (USD)
$3 Million$1 Million
Primary Users
Soviet Air Defence ForcesUS Air Force
First Flight
19641959
Last Production Year
19841972
# Units Built
1,1861,189
Status
Limited ServiceIn Service
Seats
12
Length
23 m78 ft
14 m46 ft
Wingspan
14 m46 ft
7 m25 ft
Wing Area
61 m²660 ft²
16 m²172 ft²
Height
6 m20 ft
3 m12 ft
Empty Weight
19,999 kg44,090 lbs
3,266 kg7,200 lbs
Gross Weight
29,030 kg64,000 lbs
5,361 kg11,820 lbs
MTOW
36,718 kg80,950 lbs
5,484 kg12,090 lbs
Fuel Capacity
14,921 kg32,895 lbs
1,715 kg3,780 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
TumanskyGeneral Electric
Engine Model
R-15B-300J85-5A
Dry Thrust
74 kN16,500 lbs
9 kN2,050 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
100 kN22,500 lbf
13 kN2,900 lbf
Max Thrust
200 kN45,000 lbf
26 kN5,800 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.83Mach 1.30
Top Speed
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
1,381 km/h858 mph
Range
1,852 km1,000 nm
2,111 km1,140 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s40,900 ft/min
168 m/s33,000 ft/min
Ceiling
22,860 m75,000 ft
15,240 m50,000 ft
G Limit
4 g7 g

What Are the Differences Between the MiG-25 and T-38 Talon

MiG-25 vs T-38 Talon Size Comparison

  • At 23.80 meters, the MiG-25 is 9.70 meters longer than the T-38 Talon.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-25 is 6.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the MiG-25 is 2.20 meters bigger than that of the T-38 Talon’s 3.90 meters.

MiG-25 vs T-38 Talon Price

  • The MiG-25 is more expensive than the T-38 Talon, with a unit cost of approximately 3 million compared to the T-38 Talon’s unit cost of approximately 1 million.

MiG-25 vs T-38 Talon Speed

  • The MiG-25 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the T-38 Talon has a top speed of 858 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the MiG-25 1,042 miles per hour faster than the T-38 Talon.

About the MiG-25

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25, known by its NATO reporting name "Foxbat," is a high-speed reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft that was among the fastest military aircraft ever built. Developed by the Soviet Union in the 1960s, the MiG-25 was designed to counter the American Mach 3 XB-70 Valkyrie bomber (which never entered service), and the SR-71 Blackbird reconnaissance aircraft. With its introduction in 1970, the MiG-25 shattered several world records for speed and altitude, showcasing the technological prowess of the Soviet aerospace industry during that era.

Production History: The MiG-25's development began in the early 1960s, with its first flight occurring in 1964. The aircraft entered service in 1970, with production continuing until 1984. Over this period, approximately 1,190 units were built across various variants. The MiG-25's capabilities were so advanced for its time that its existence prompted significant changes in Western military aviation strategy and development programs.

Design Features: The MiG-25 was constructed primarily of stainless steel and nickel-steel alloys, allowing it to withstand the extreme temperatures generated at high speeds. It was powered by two powerful Tumansky R-15 turbojet engines, enabling it to reach speeds of up to Mach 2.83. The aircraft featured a large airframe with a distinctive high-wing layout and twin vertical stabilizers. The MiG-25's armament typically included four air-to-air missiles for the interceptor variants.

Operational History: Although initially intended to intercept high-speed, high-altitude threats, the MiG-25 found its niche as a reconnaissance platform, where its exceptional speed and altitude capabilities could be fully exploited. The aircraft saw service in several Cold War confrontations and regional conflicts, providing critical intelligence and engaging in occasional air-to-air combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-25 vs. SR-71 Blackbird

Role and Capabilities: While Lockheed's SR-71 Blackbird was designed exclusively for strategic reconnaissance at high speeds and altitudes, the MiG-25 served in both reconnaissance and interceptor roles. Both aircraft were capable of outrunning threats with their exceptional speed.

Performance: The MiG-25 could reach similar altitudes and speeds as the SR-71, making it one of the few aircraft capable of posing a threat to the Blackbird. However, the SR-71's range and sophisticated sensors allowed it to conduct longer and more detailed reconnaissance missions.

MiG-25 vs. MiG-31

Design Evolution: The MiG-31 Foxhound was developed as a successor to the MiG-25, incorporating lessons learned from its predecessor's operational history. It featured an improved airframe, more advanced avionics, and the capability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-31 significantly expanded on the MiG-25's interceptor role with its ability to engage multiple targets simultaneously, thanks to its advanced radar and weapons systems. While both aircraft shared exceptional high-speed performance, the MiG-31 offered better overall combat capabilities and versatility.

About the T-38 Talon

The T-38 Talon is a twin-engine, high-altitude, supersonic jet trainer used primarily by the United States Air Force for pilot training. Developed by Northrop Corporation in the late 1950s, it was the first supersonic training aircraft in the world and has been instrumental in preparing generations of military aviators for fighter and bomber missions.

Production History: The T-38 was introduced in 1961, with production running until 1972. Over this period, more than 1,100 units were produced. The aircraft was designed to offer a cost-effective, high-performance training solution, capable of simulating the flight characteristics of much larger and more expensive fighter jets. It has undergone various upgrades over its service life to enhance its avionics, safety features, and overall performance, ensuring its continued relevance in pilot training.

Design Features: Featuring a sleek, lightweight design, the T-38 can achieve Mach 1.3 thanks to its twin General Electric J85 turbojet engines. Its tandem-seat configuration allows an instructor and a student to be seated in line, with the student pilot typically in the front seat. The T-38's design emphasizes ease of control and stability at supersonic speeds, making it an ideal platform for transitioning pilots to more advanced aircraft.

Operational History: The T-38 has been used extensively for advanced pilot training, including undergraduate pilot training, pilot instructor training, and as a companion trainer for various frontline fighter and bomber aircraft. It has also served in non-training roles, such as a chase aircraft for research and development programs. Its operational history is marked by its adaptability, having been deployed in numerous bases across the United States and abroad.

Comparison with Similar Models:

T-38 Talon vs. Hawk T1

Training Philosophy: Both the T-38 and the Hawk T1 are used for advanced pilot training, but the T-38 is specifically tailored for preparing pilots for high-speed jet operations, emphasizing supersonic flight training.

Technological and Performance Aspects: The T-38's design focuses on simplicity and performance, offering a straightforward, no-frills approach to supersonic training. The Hawk T1, by comparison, includes more modern avionics and can be equipped with weapons for combat training missions.

T-38 Talon vs. Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet

Design Intent and Usage: The T-38 was developed primarily as a trainer with a focus on high-altitude, supersonic flight characteristics. The Alpha Jet, a Franco-German collaboration, was designed to fulfill both training and light attack roles, making it more versatile in terms of operational deployment.

Performance Characteristics: While the Alpha Jet offers a good balance between subsonic and supersonic performance and has seen use as a light attack aircraft, the T-38 specializes in preparing pilots for the demands of flying high-performance, supersonic jets, focusing on the skills needed for air superiority missions.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.