Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

MiG-25 vs. MiG-27

Compare

MiG-25

vs.

MiG-27

Role
InterceptorGround-attack
Generation
3rd generationNo generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionSoviet Union
Manufacturer
Mikoyan-GurevichMikoyan
Price (USD)
$3 Million$7 Million
Primary Users
Soviet Air Defence ForcesSoviet Air Forces
First Flight
19641970
Last Production Year
19841994
# Units Built
1,1861,075
Status
Limited ServiceLimited Service
Seats
11
Length
23 m78 ft
17 m56 ft
Wingspan
14 m46 ft
14 m45 ft
Wing Area
61 m²660 ft²
37 m²402 ft²
Height
6 m20 ft
5 m16 ft
Empty Weight
19,999 kg44,090 lbs
11,907 kg26,250 lbs
Gross Weight
29,030 kg64,000 lbs
20,298 kg44,750 lbs
MTOW
36,718 kg80,950 lbs
20,670 kg45,570 lbs
Fuel Capacity
14,921 kg32,895 lbs
5,674 kg12,510 lbs
Number of Engines
21
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
TumanskyTumansky
Engine Model
R-15B-300R-29-B-300
Dry Thrust
74 kN16,500 lbs
79 kN17,600 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
100 kN22,500 lbf
113 kN25,400 lbf
Max Thrust
200 kN45,000 lbf
113 kN25,400 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.83Mach 1.77
Top Speed
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
1,885 km/h1,171 mph
Range
1,852 km1,000 nm
778 km420 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s40,900 ft/min
198 m/s39,000 ft/min
Ceiling
22,860 m75,000 ft
14,021 m46,000 ft
G Limit
4 g7 g

What Are the Differences Between the MiG-25 and MiG-27

MiG-25 vs MiG-27 Size Comparison

  • At 23.80 meters, the MiG-25 is 6.70 meters longer than the MiG-27.
  • The MiG-25 and the MiG-27 have the same wingspan at 14.0 m
  • The wing area of the MiG-25 is 1.10 meters bigger than that of the MiG-27’s 5 meters.

MiG-25 vs MiG-27 Price

  • The MiG-27 is more expensive than the MiG-25, with a unit cost of approximately 7 million compared to the MiG-25’s unit cost of approximately 3 million.

MiG-25 vs MiG-27 Speed

  • The MiG-25 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the MiG-27 has a top speed of 1,171 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the MiG-25 729 miles per hour faster than the MiG-27.

About the MiG-25

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25, known by its NATO reporting name "Foxbat," is a high-speed reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft that was among the fastest military aircraft ever built. Developed by the Soviet Union in the 1960s, the MiG-25 was designed to counter the American Mach 3 XB-70 Valkyrie bomber (which never entered service), and the SR-71 Blackbird reconnaissance aircraft. With its introduction in 1970, the MiG-25 shattered several world records for speed and altitude, showcasing the technological prowess of the Soviet aerospace industry during that era.

Production History: The MiG-25's development began in the early 1960s, with its first flight occurring in 1964. The aircraft entered service in 1970, with production continuing until 1984. Over this period, approximately 1,190 units were built across various variants. The MiG-25's capabilities were so advanced for its time that its existence prompted significant changes in Western military aviation strategy and development programs.

Design Features: The MiG-25 was constructed primarily of stainless steel and nickel-steel alloys, allowing it to withstand the extreme temperatures generated at high speeds. It was powered by two powerful Tumansky R-15 turbojet engines, enabling it to reach speeds of up to Mach 2.83. The aircraft featured a large airframe with a distinctive high-wing layout and twin vertical stabilizers. The MiG-25's armament typically included four air-to-air missiles for the interceptor variants.

Operational History: Although initially intended to intercept high-speed, high-altitude threats, the MiG-25 found its niche as a reconnaissance platform, where its exceptional speed and altitude capabilities could be fully exploited. The aircraft saw service in several Cold War confrontations and regional conflicts, providing critical intelligence and engaging in occasional air-to-air combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-25 vs. SR-71 Blackbird

Role and Capabilities: While Lockheed's SR-71 Blackbird was designed exclusively for strategic reconnaissance at high speeds and altitudes, the MiG-25 served in both reconnaissance and interceptor roles. Both aircraft were capable of outrunning threats with their exceptional speed.

Performance: The MiG-25 could reach similar altitudes and speeds as the SR-71, making it one of the few aircraft capable of posing a threat to the Blackbird. However, the SR-71's range and sophisticated sensors allowed it to conduct longer and more detailed reconnaissance missions.

MiG-25 vs. MiG-31

Design Evolution: The MiG-31 Foxhound was developed as a successor to the MiG-25, incorporating lessons learned from its predecessor's operational history. It featured an improved airframe, more advanced avionics, and the capability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-31 significantly expanded on the MiG-25's interceptor role with its ability to engage multiple targets simultaneously, thanks to its advanced radar and weapons systems. While both aircraft shared exceptional high-speed performance, the MiG-31 offered better overall combat capabilities and versatility.

About the MiG-27

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-27, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger-D/J," is a ground-attack aircraft derived from the MiG-23 fighter aircraft, designed and built by the Soviet Union. Introduced in the 1970s, the MiG-27 was specifically optimized for the air-to-ground role, featuring significant modifications to enhance its low-altitude flying capability and survivability over the battlefield.

Production History: The development of the MiG-27 was a direct result of the experience gained from the MiG-23's performance, with a focus on improving its functionality in a dedicated ground-attack role. The MiG-27 entered service in the mid-1970s, with production continuing until 1986. Over 1,000 units were produced, serving in the air forces of the Soviet Union and several other nations.

Design Features: Key design changes from the MiG-23 to the MiG-27 included a redesigned nose to accommodate a ground-attack radar and an optical sight, simpler fixed intakes to replace the variable-geometry intakes, and strengthened landing gear to withstand the rigors of low-altitude operations. The MiG-27's armament was centered around a powerful 6-barrel rotary 30mm cannon, with hardpoints for a variety of bombs, rockets, and missiles tailored for ground-attack missions.

Operational History: The MiG-27 played a significant role in several regional conflicts, most notably in the Soviet–Afghan War, where it was used extensively for close air support and interdiction missions. Its service life extended into the 21st century with several air forces, demonstrating its durability and effectiveness in combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-27 vs. Su-25

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-27 and the Su-25 were designed for close air support and ground-attack missions. While the MiG-27 was adapted from a fighter design and retained some air-to-air capabilities, the Su-25 was purpose-built as a ground-attack aircraft.

Performance: The Su-25 offers superior survivability in a ground-attack role due to its armored cockpit and redundancy in critical systems. The MiG-27, however, benefits from higher speeds and flexibility offered by its variable-geometry wings, allowing for quick ingress and egress from the target area.

MiG-27 vs. A-10 Thunderbolt II

Design Evolution: The A-10 Thunderbolt II and the MiG-27 were developed around the same time, with both aircraft focusing on close air support and combat survivability. The A-10 was designed around its powerful GAU-8 Avenger rotary cannon, with an emphasis on loiter capability and battlefield survivability.

Operational Capabilities: While the A-10 is renowned for its tank-killing capabilities, particularly with its armor-piercing ammunition, the MiG-27 offered a broader range of weapons for engaging both soft and hard targets.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.