Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

MiG-23 vs. Mikoyan MiG-35

vs.
Compare

MiG-23

vs.

MiG-35

Role
FighterMulitrole fighter
Generation
3rd generation4++ generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionRussia
Manufacturer
Mikoyan-GurevichMikoyan
Price (USD)
$6 Million$40 Million
Primary Users
Soviet Air ForcesRussian Aerospace Forces
First Flight
19672016
Last Production Year
1985In Production
# Units Built
5,0476
Status
Limited ServiceIn Service
Seats
11 (MiG 35) / 2 (MiG 35D)
Length
16 m54 ft
17 m56 ft
Wingspan
14 m45 ft
12 m39 ft
Wing Area
37 m²402 ft²
41 m²441 ft²
Height
4 m15 ft
4 m15 ft
Empty Weight
10,886 kg24,000 lbs
12,000 kg26,455 lbs
Gross Weight
14,842 kg32,720 lbs
17,500 kg38,580 lbs
MTOW
17,799 kg39,240 lbs
24,494 kg54,000 lbs
Fuel Capacity
4,672 kg10,300 lbs
6,985 kg15,400 lbs
Number of Engines
12
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbofan
Engine Manufacturer
KhatchaturovKlimov
Engine Model
R-35-300RD-33MK
Dry Thrust
84 kN18,800 lbs
52 kN12,000 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
127 kN28,660 lbf
88 kN19,800 lbf
Max Thrust
127 kN28,660 lbf
176 kN39,600 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.35Mach 2.25
Top Speed
2,499 km/h1,553 mph
2,092 km/h1,300 mph
Range
1,852 km1,000 nm
2,037 km1,100 nm
Rate of Climb
229 m/s45,000 ft/min
330 m/s65,000 ft/min
Ceiling
18,501 m60,700 ft
15,850 m52,000 ft
G Limit
7 g9 g

What Are the Differences Between the MiG-23 and Mikoyan MiG-35

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-35 Size Comparison

  • At 17.30 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-35 is 0.60 meters longer than the MiG-23.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-23 is 2 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the MiG-23 is 0.10 meters bigger than that of the Mikoyan MiG-35’s 4.70 meters.

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-35 Price

  • The Mikoyan MiG-35 is more expensive than the MiG-23, with a unit cost of approximately 40 million compared to the MiG-23’s unit cost of approximately 6 million.

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-35 Speed

  • The MiG-23 has a top speed of 1,553 miles per hour, and the Mikoyan MiG-35 has a top speed of 1,300 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the MiG-23 253 miles per hour faster than the Mikoyan MiG-35.

About the MiG-23

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger," is a third-generation jet fighter developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1960s. The MiG-23 was designed to meet the need for a more versatile and capable fighter, capable of achieving Mach 2.35 speeds, and was introduced as a successor to the MiG-21. It served in various roles, including interceptor, ground-attack, and scouting.

Production History: The MiG-23 was introduced into service with the Soviet Air Forces in 1970. Over its production life, which spanned two decades, more than 5,000 units were built, making it one of the most produced fighter aircraft of its time. The MiG-23 was exported widely, serving in the air forces of over 30 countries, and saw action in numerous conflicts during the latter half of the 20th century.

Design Features: The MiG-23's most notable feature is its swing-wing design, which allows the wings to be set at different angles to optimize performance at various speeds. At lower speeds, the wings could be extended for better lift and maneuverability, while at higher speeds, they could be swept back to reduce drag. The aircraft was powered by a single large turbojet engine, equipped with an afterburner for additional thrust.

Operational History: The MiG-23 saw combat in several Middle Eastern conflicts, including the Yom Kippur War, the Iran-Iraq War, and the Syrian Civil War. It was used extensively by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, where it was employed in both air-to-air combat and ground-attack roles. Despite its advanced design, the MiG-23 faced challenges in terms of maintenance and operational readiness, particularly in the hands of less experienced air forces.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-23 vs. F-4 Phantom II

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-23 and F-4 Phantom II were designed as multi-role fighters capable of performing both air superiority and ground-attack missions. The MiG-23's variable-geometry wings provided it with a broader performance envelope, especially in terms of speed and altitude capabilities.

Performance: The F-4 Phantom II, while older, was known for its reliability, heavy payload, and versatility. In contrast, the MiG-23 offered better agility at high speeds and a more sophisticated radar and missile armament for air-to-air engagements.

MiG-23 vs. F-14 Tomcat

Design Evolution: The F-14 Tomcat and the MiG-23 were both developed around the same time and featured variable-geometry wings. This design was chosen by both manufacturers for similar reasons: to provide excellent performance across a wide range of speeds and altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The F-14 was primarily designed as a fleet defense interceptor for the U.S. Navy and excelled in long-range air-to-air engagements. The MiG-23, while also capable in the interceptor role, was more versatile, being used extensively in ground-attack missions in addition to air superiority roles.

About the Mikoyan MiG-35

The Mikoyan MiG-35 (NATO codename "Fulcrum-F) is a 4++ generation multirole fighter aircraft developed from the MiG-29M/M2 and MiG-29K/KUB. Introduced in the 2000s by Russia, the MiG-35 represents the pinnacle of the Fulcrum series, incorporating advanced technology to meet the demands of modern warfare.

Production History: The development of the MiG-35 began as an advancement of the MiG-29 program, aiming to extend the aircraft's service life and compete against Western 4th generation fighters. The MiG-35 made its first public appearance in 2007, with the Russian Air Force expressing interest in acquiring the aircraft to modernize its fleet. While initially proposed in the early 2000s, the MiG-35 has seen various delays, with commencement of operational testing by the Russian military occurring from 2016 to 2017.

Design Features: The MiG-35 features improved aerodynamics and reduced radar cross-section over its predecessors. It is equipped with state-of-the-art avionics, including a phased array radar, advanced electronic warfare systems, and a sophisticated glass cockpit. The aircraft's propulsion system is upgraded with new engines that enable supersonic flight without afterburners. The MiG-35 is capable of carrying a wide range of Russian and international weapons on its nine hardpoints, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, and precision-guided bombs.

Operational History: As of the last update, the MiG-35 is in the late stages of development and testing, with the Russian Air Force conducting comprehensive evaluations. The aircraft has been showcased in international air shows and offered to foreign buyers as a highly capable multirole fighter. While not yet combat-proven, the MiG-35 is expected to serve as a versatile platform capable of executing a wide array of missions, from air superiority to ground attack and reconnaissance.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-35 vs. MiG-29

Role and Capabilities: The MiG-35 is an evolution of the MiG-29, designed to extend the capabilities of the Fulcrum series into the next generation of air combat. It offers significant advancements in radar, avionics, and weapon systems.

Performance: With enhanced engines and aerodynamics, the MiG-35 provides superior agility, speed, and range compared to the MiG-29. Its ability to perform supersonic flights without afterburners and increased payload capacity make it a formidable opponent in both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions.

MiG-35 vs. F-16 Fighting Falcon

Design Evolution: While the F-16 is a 4th generation multirole fighter renowned for its versatility and agility, the MiG-35 represents a 4++ generation development, incorporating advances in stealth, avionics, and operational capabilities beyond the original Fulcrum design.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-35's modern avionics suite, including AESA radar and enhanced electronic warfare systems, offers a competitive edge in detecting and engaging threats at greater distances. In contrast, the F-16 has undergone numerous upgrades to maintain its effectiveness, with the latest variants featuring advanced radar and precision weapons.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.