Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

MiG-23 vs. Mikoyan MiG-31

Compare

MiG-23

vs.

MiG-31

Role
FighterInterceptor
Generation
3rd generationNo generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionSoviet Union
Manufacturer
Mikoyan-GurevichMikoyan
Price (USD)
$6 Million$33 Million
Primary Users
Soviet Air ForcesRussian Aerospace Forces
First Flight
19671975
Last Production Year
19851994
# Units Built
5,047519
Status
Limited ServiceIn Service
Seats
12
Length
16 m54 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
14 m45 ft
13 m44 ft
Wing Area
37 m²402 ft²
61 m²663 ft²
Height
4 m15 ft
6 m21 ft
Empty Weight
10,886 kg24,000 lbs
21,820 kg48,105 lbs
Gross Weight
14,842 kg32,720 lbs
41,000 kg90,390 lbs
MTOW
17,799 kg39,240 lbs
46,198 kg101,850 lbs
Fuel Capacity
4,672 kg10,300 lbs
16,125 kg35,550 lbs
Number of Engines
12
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbofan
Engine Manufacturer
KhatchaturovSoloviev
Engine Model
R-35-300D-30F6
Dry Thrust
84 kN18,800 lbs
93 kN21,000 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
127 kN28,660 lbf
152 kN34,000 lbf
Max Thrust
127 kN28,660 lbf
304 kN68,000 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.35Mach 2.83
Top Speed
2,499 km/h1,553 mph
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
Range
1,852 km1,000 nm
2,134 km1,152 nm
Rate of Climb
229 m/s45,000 ft/min
288 m/s56,700 ft/min
Ceiling
18,501 m60,700 ft
24,994 m82,000 ft
G Limit
7 g5 g

What Are the Differences Between the MiG-23 and Mikoyan MiG-31

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Size Comparison

  • At 22.60 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 5.90 meters longer than the MiG-23.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-23 is 0.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 1.70 meters bigger than that of the MiG-23’s 4.80 meters.

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Price

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 is more expensive than the MiG-23, with a unit cost of approximately 33 million compared to the MiG-23’s unit cost of approximately 6 million.

MiG-23 vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Speed

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the MiG-23 has a top speed of 1,553 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the Mikoyan MiG-31 347 miles per hour faster than the MiG-23.

About the MiG-23

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger," is a third-generation jet fighter developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1960s. The MiG-23 was designed to meet the need for a more versatile and capable fighter, capable of achieving Mach 2.35 speeds, and was introduced as a successor to the MiG-21. It served in various roles, including interceptor, ground-attack, and scouting.

Production History: The MiG-23 was introduced into service with the Soviet Air Forces in 1970. Over its production life, which spanned two decades, more than 5,000 units were built, making it one of the most produced fighter aircraft of its time. The MiG-23 was exported widely, serving in the air forces of over 30 countries, and saw action in numerous conflicts during the latter half of the 20th century.

Design Features: The MiG-23's most notable feature is its swing-wing design, which allows the wings to be set at different angles to optimize performance at various speeds. At lower speeds, the wings could be extended for better lift and maneuverability, while at higher speeds, they could be swept back to reduce drag. The aircraft was powered by a single large turbojet engine, equipped with an afterburner for additional thrust.

Operational History: The MiG-23 saw combat in several Middle Eastern conflicts, including the Yom Kippur War, the Iran-Iraq War, and the Syrian Civil War. It was used extensively by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, where it was employed in both air-to-air combat and ground-attack roles. Despite its advanced design, the MiG-23 faced challenges in terms of maintenance and operational readiness, particularly in the hands of less experienced air forces.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-23 vs. F-4 Phantom II

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-23 and F-4 Phantom II were designed as multi-role fighters capable of performing both air superiority and ground-attack missions. The MiG-23's variable-geometry wings provided it with a broader performance envelope, especially in terms of speed and altitude capabilities.

Performance: The F-4 Phantom II, while older, was known for its reliability, heavy payload, and versatility. In contrast, the MiG-23 offered better agility at high speeds and a more sophisticated radar and missile armament for air-to-air engagements.

MiG-23 vs. F-14 Tomcat

Design Evolution: The F-14 Tomcat and the MiG-23 were both developed around the same time and featured variable-geometry wings. This design was chosen by both manufacturers for similar reasons: to provide excellent performance across a wide range of speeds and altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The F-14 was primarily designed as a fleet defense interceptor for the U.S. Navy and excelled in long-range air-to-air engagements. The MiG-23, while also capable in the interceptor role, was more versatile, being used extensively in ground-attack missions in addition to air superiority roles.

About the Mikoyan MiG-31

The Mikoyan MiG-31 "Foxhound," is a high-speed interceptor aircraft developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It was designed as a successor to the MiG-25, with the primary mission of engaging and destroying enemy aircraft at long ranges and high altitudes. The MiG-31 entered service with the Soviet Air Defense Forces in 1981 and remains one of the fastest combat jets in the world.

Production History: The development of the MiG-31 began in the early 1970s, aiming to address the shortcomings of the MiG-25, particularly in terms of radar technology and overall combat capabilities. The first prototype flew in 1975, leading to the aircraft's introduction into operational service in 1981. Over its production life, which officially ended in 1994, approximately 500 MiG-31s were built.

Design Features: The MiG-31 is distinguished by its large airframe, twin-engine configuration, and advanced Zaslon radar system, which was the first phased-array radar fitted to a fighter aircraft. This radar enables the MiG-31 to detect and engage targets at ranges exceeding 200 kilometers, far beyond visual range. The aircraft is powered by two powerful Soloviev D-30F6 turbofan engines, allowing it to reach speeds up to Mach 2.83.

Operational History: The MiG-31 has primarily served in the air defense role, patrolling the vast borders of the Soviet Union and its successor state, Russia. It has been a vital component of Russia's air defense strategy, capable of intercepting high-speed reconnaissance aircraft, bombers, and cruise missiles. The MiG-31 has not seen combat in major conflicts but has been regularly updated to maintain its relevance against modern threats.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-31 vs. MiG-25

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were designed as high-speed interceptors, but the MiG-31 significantly surpasses the MiG-25 in terms of radar capabilities, engagement range, and multi-target tracking ability. The MiG-31's design improvements allow it to engage low-flying targets effectively, addressing a key limitation of the MiG-25.

Performance: While the MiG-25 set speed and altitude records, the MiG-31 offers better overall performance, including the ability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes, increased endurance, and improved combat effectiveness.

MiG-31 vs. F-22 Raptor

Design Evolution: The F-22 Raptor represents a leap in technology as a fifth-generation fighter, emphasizing stealth, agility, and situational awareness. In contrast, the MiG-31 focuses on high speed, altitude, and long-range detection and engagement, prioritizing a different set of operational requirements.

Operational Capabilities: The F-22 excels in stealth, air superiority, and ground attack roles, making it versatile on the modern battlefield. The MiG-31, however, remains unmatched in its niche as a long-range interceptor, capable of engaging targets at distances where most fighters cannot operate effectively.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.