Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

F-4 Phantom II vs. T-38 Talon

vs.
Compare

F-4

vs.

T-38

Role
Fighter-bomberAdvanced Trainer
Generation
3rd generationNo generation
National Origin
United StatesUnited States
Manufacturer
McDonnell DouglasNorthrop
Price (USD)
$3 Million$1 Million
Primary Users
US NavyUS Air Force
First Flight
19581959
Last Production Year
19811972
# Units Built
5,1951,189
Status
RetiredIn Service
Seats
22
Length
19 m63 ft
14 m46 ft
Wingspan
11 m38 ft
7 m25 ft
Wing Area
49 m²529 ft²
16 m²172 ft²
Height
5 m16 ft
3 m12 ft
Empty Weight
13,757 kg30,330 lbs
3,266 kg7,200 lbs
Gross Weight
18,824 kg41,500 lbs
5,361 kg11,820 lbs
MTOW
28,030 kg61,795 lbs
5,484 kg12,090 lbs
Fuel Capacity
7,257 kg16,000 lbs
1,715 kg3,780 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
General ElectricGeneral Electric
Engine Model
J79-GE-17AJ85-5A
Dry Thrust
53 kN11,905 lbs
9 kN2,050 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
79 kN17,845 lbf
13 kN2,900 lbf
Max Thrust
159 kN35,690 lbf
26 kN5,800 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.23Mach 1.30
Top Speed
2,371 km/h1,473 mph
1,381 km/h858 mph
Range
2,815 km1,520 nm
2,111 km1,140 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s41,000 ft/min
168 m/s33,000 ft/min
Ceiling
17,069 m56,000 ft
15,240 m50,000 ft
G Limit
6 g7 g

What Are the Differences Between the F-4 Phantom II and T-38 Talon

F-4 Phantom II vs T-38 Talon Size Comparison

  • At 19.20 meters, the F-4 Phantom II is 5.10 meters longer than the T-38 Talon.
  • With a wingspan of 11.70 meters, the F-4 Phantom II is 4 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the F-4 Phantom II is 1.10 meters bigger than that of the T-38 Talon’s 3.90 meters.

F-4 Phantom II vs T-38 Talon Price

  • The F-4 Phantom II is more expensive than the T-38 Talon, with a unit cost of approximately 3 million compared to the T-38 Talon’s unit cost of approximately 1 million.

F-4 Phantom II vs T-38 Talon Speed

  • The F-4 Phantom II has a top speed of 1,473 miles per hour, and the T-38 Talon has a top speed of 858 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the F-4 Phantom II 615 miles per hour faster than the T-38 Talon.

About the F-4 Phantom II

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is one of the most significant fighter jets in military aviation history, known for its versatility, powerful performance, and distinctive appearance. Initially developed for the US Navy in the late 1950s, the F-4 Phantom II set numerous speed and altitude records for its time and was later adopted by the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Air Force.

Production History: The F-4 Phantom II was designed to meet the U.S. Navy's need for a supersonic fighter capable of carrying a significant payload over long distances, without sacrificing speed and maneuverability. The aircraft saw extensive combat in the Vietnam War, serving in both ground-attack and air superiority roles. Production ran from 1958 to 1981, with over 5,000 units built, making it one of the most produced American supersonic military aircraft.

Design Features: Characterized by its large size, twin engines, and tandem two-seat configuration, the F-4 Phantom II was designed without an internal cannon in its initial versions, relying instead on missiles for air combat. The F-4's distinctive design included drooping tail fins and diagonal tail wings, contributing to its recognizable silhouette.

Operational History: The F-4 Phantom II saw extensive use in the Vietnam War, where it performed admirably in dogfighting against lighter North Vietnamese aircraft, as well as in bombing missions. It was also a key figure in American air power throughout the Cold War. The F-4 served with distinction in later conflicts such as the Persian Gulf War and remained in use by several countries into the 21st century.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-4 Phantom II vs. F-105 Thunderchief

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were critical to the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. The F-105 was primarily used for deep strike bombing missions, while the F-4 served in a wider range of roles, including air superiority, fleet defense, and reconnaissance.

Performance: The F-105 Thunderchief, known as the "Thud," was the faster of the two at low altitude and carried a larger bomb load for ground-attack missions. However, the F-4 Phantom II's superior agility, higher service ceiling, and ability to operate from carriers made it a more adaptable and formidable aircraft.

F-4 Phantom II vs. MiG-21

Design: The MiG-21 was the Soviet Union's counterpart to the F-4 during the Vietnam War. It was smaller, lighter, and offered greater agility, designed primarily for air superiority with a secondary ground-attack capability. In contrast, the F-4 was a larger, more versatile fighter-bomber that could engage targets at longer ranges with its superior radar and missile armament.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-21's agility made it a formidable adversary in visual range dogfights, while the F-4's powerful engines, advanced avionics, and diverse weapons loadout gave it an edge in beyond-visual-range engagements and multirole missions.

About the T-38 Talon

The T-38 Talon is a twin-engine, high-altitude, supersonic jet trainer used primarily by the United States Air Force for pilot training. Developed by Northrop Corporation in the late 1950s, it was the first supersonic training aircraft in the world and has been instrumental in preparing generations of military aviators for fighter and bomber missions.

Production History: The T-38 was introduced in 1961, with production running until 1972. Over this period, more than 1,100 units were produced. The aircraft was designed to offer a cost-effective, high-performance training solution, capable of simulating the flight characteristics of much larger and more expensive fighter jets. It has undergone various upgrades over its service life to enhance its avionics, safety features, and overall performance, ensuring its continued relevance in pilot training.

Design Features: Featuring a sleek, lightweight design, the T-38 can achieve Mach 1.3 thanks to its twin General Electric J85 turbojet engines. Its tandem-seat configuration allows an instructor and a student to be seated in line, with the student pilot typically in the front seat. The T-38's design emphasizes ease of control and stability at supersonic speeds, making it an ideal platform for transitioning pilots to more advanced aircraft.

Operational History: The T-38 has been used extensively for advanced pilot training, including undergraduate pilot training, pilot instructor training, and as a companion trainer for various frontline fighter and bomber aircraft. It has also served in non-training roles, such as a chase aircraft for research and development programs. Its operational history is marked by its adaptability, having been deployed in numerous bases across the United States and abroad.

Comparison with Similar Models:

T-38 Talon vs. Hawk T1

Training Philosophy: Both the T-38 and the Hawk T1 are used for advanced pilot training, but the T-38 is specifically tailored for preparing pilots for high-speed jet operations, emphasizing supersonic flight training.

Technological and Performance Aspects: The T-38's design focuses on simplicity and performance, offering a straightforward, no-frills approach to supersonic training. The Hawk T1, by comparison, includes more modern avionics and can be equipped with weapons for combat training missions.

T-38 Talon vs. Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet

Design Intent and Usage: The T-38 was developed primarily as a trainer with a focus on high-altitude, supersonic flight characteristics. The Alpha Jet, a Franco-German collaboration, was designed to fulfill both training and light attack roles, making it more versatile in terms of operational deployment.

Performance Characteristics: While the Alpha Jet offers a good balance between subsonic and supersonic performance and has seen use as a light attack aircraft, the T-38 specializes in preparing pilots for the demands of flying high-performance, supersonic jets, focusing on the skills needed for air superiority missions.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.