Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

F-4 Phantom II vs. Mikoyan MiG-31

vs.
Compare

F-4

vs.

MiG-31

Role
Fighter-bomberInterceptor
Generation
3rd generationNo generation
National Origin
United StatesSoviet Union
Manufacturer
McDonnell DouglasMikoyan
Price (USD)
$3 Million$33 Million
Primary Users
US NavyRussian Aerospace Forces
First Flight
19581975
Last Production Year
19811994
# Units Built
5,195519
Status
RetiredIn Service
Seats
22
Length
19 m63 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
11 m38 ft
13 m44 ft
Wing Area
49 m²529 ft²
61 m²663 ft²
Height
5 m16 ft
6 m21 ft
Empty Weight
13,757 kg30,330 lbs
21,820 kg48,105 lbs
Gross Weight
18,824 kg41,500 lbs
41,000 kg90,390 lbs
MTOW
28,030 kg61,795 lbs
46,198 kg101,850 lbs
Fuel Capacity
7,257 kg16,000 lbs
16,125 kg35,550 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbofan
Engine Manufacturer
General ElectricSoloviev
Engine Model
J79-GE-17AD-30F6
Dry Thrust
53 kN11,905 lbs
93 kN21,000 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
79 kN17,845 lbf
152 kN34,000 lbf
Max Thrust
159 kN35,690 lbf
304 kN68,000 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.23Mach 2.83
Top Speed
2,371 km/h1,473 mph
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
Range
2,815 km1,520 nm
2,134 km1,152 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s41,000 ft/min
288 m/s56,700 ft/min
Ceiling
17,069 m56,000 ft
24,994 m82,000 ft
G Limit
6 g5 g

What Are the Differences Between the F-4 Phantom II and Mikoyan MiG-31

F-4 Phantom II vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Size Comparison

  • At 22.60 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 3.40 meters longer than the F-4 Phantom II.
  • With a wingspan of 13.50 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 1.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the Mikoyan MiG-31 is 1.50 meters bigger than that of the F-4 Phantom II’s 5 meters.

F-4 Phantom II vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Price

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 is more expensive than the F-4 Phantom II, with a unit cost of approximately 33 million compared to the F-4 Phantom II’s unit cost of approximately 3 million.

F-4 Phantom II vs Mikoyan MiG-31 Speed

  • The Mikoyan MiG-31 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the F-4 Phantom II has a top speed of 1,473 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the Mikoyan MiG-31 427 miles per hour faster than the F-4 Phantom II.

About the F-4 Phantom II

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is one of the most significant fighter jets in military aviation history, known for its versatility, powerful performance, and distinctive appearance. Initially developed for the US Navy in the late 1950s, the F-4 Phantom II set numerous speed and altitude records for its time and was later adopted by the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Air Force.

Production History: The F-4 Phantom II was designed to meet the U.S. Navy's need for a supersonic fighter capable of carrying a significant payload over long distances, without sacrificing speed and maneuverability. The aircraft saw extensive combat in the Vietnam War, serving in both ground-attack and air superiority roles. Production ran from 1958 to 1981, with over 5,000 units built, making it one of the most produced American supersonic military aircraft.

Design Features: Characterized by its large size, twin engines, and tandem two-seat configuration, the F-4 Phantom II was designed without an internal cannon in its initial versions, relying instead on missiles for air combat. The F-4's distinctive design included drooping tail fins and diagonal tail wings, contributing to its recognizable silhouette.

Operational History: The F-4 Phantom II saw extensive use in the Vietnam War, where it performed admirably in dogfighting against lighter North Vietnamese aircraft, as well as in bombing missions. It was also a key figure in American air power throughout the Cold War. The F-4 served with distinction in later conflicts such as the Persian Gulf War and remained in use by several countries into the 21st century.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-4 Phantom II vs. F-105 Thunderchief

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were critical to the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. The F-105 was primarily used for deep strike bombing missions, while the F-4 served in a wider range of roles, including air superiority, fleet defense, and reconnaissance.

Performance: The F-105 Thunderchief, known as the "Thud," was the faster of the two at low altitude and carried a larger bomb load for ground-attack missions. However, the F-4 Phantom II's superior agility, higher service ceiling, and ability to operate from carriers made it a more adaptable and formidable aircraft.

F-4 Phantom II vs. MiG-21

Design: The MiG-21 was the Soviet Union's counterpart to the F-4 during the Vietnam War. It was smaller, lighter, and offered greater agility, designed primarily for air superiority with a secondary ground-attack capability. In contrast, the F-4 was a larger, more versatile fighter-bomber that could engage targets at longer ranges with its superior radar and missile armament.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-21's agility made it a formidable adversary in visual range dogfights, while the F-4's powerful engines, advanced avionics, and diverse weapons loadout gave it an edge in beyond-visual-range engagements and multirole missions.

About the Mikoyan MiG-31

The Mikoyan MiG-31 "Foxhound," is a high-speed interceptor aircraft developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It was designed as a successor to the MiG-25, with the primary mission of engaging and destroying enemy aircraft at long ranges and high altitudes. The MiG-31 entered service with the Soviet Air Defense Forces in 1981 and remains one of the fastest combat jets in the world.

Production History: The development of the MiG-31 began in the early 1970s, aiming to address the shortcomings of the MiG-25, particularly in terms of radar technology and overall combat capabilities. The first prototype flew in 1975, leading to the aircraft's introduction into operational service in 1981. Over its production life, which officially ended in 1994, approximately 500 MiG-31s were built.

Design Features: The MiG-31 is distinguished by its large airframe, twin-engine configuration, and advanced Zaslon radar system, which was the first phased-array radar fitted to a fighter aircraft. This radar enables the MiG-31 to detect and engage targets at ranges exceeding 200 kilometers, far beyond visual range. The aircraft is powered by two powerful Soloviev D-30F6 turbofan engines, allowing it to reach speeds up to Mach 2.83.

Operational History: The MiG-31 has primarily served in the air defense role, patrolling the vast borders of the Soviet Union and its successor state, Russia. It has been a vital component of Russia's air defense strategy, capable of intercepting high-speed reconnaissance aircraft, bombers, and cruise missiles. The MiG-31 has not seen combat in major conflicts but has been regularly updated to maintain its relevance against modern threats.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-31 vs. MiG-25

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were designed as high-speed interceptors, but the MiG-31 significantly surpasses the MiG-25 in terms of radar capabilities, engagement range, and multi-target tracking ability. The MiG-31's design improvements allow it to engage low-flying targets effectively, addressing a key limitation of the MiG-25.

Performance: While the MiG-25 set speed and altitude records, the MiG-31 offers better overall performance, including the ability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes, increased endurance, and improved combat effectiveness.

MiG-31 vs. F-22 Raptor

Design Evolution: The F-22 Raptor represents a leap in technology as a fifth-generation fighter, emphasizing stealth, agility, and situational awareness. In contrast, the MiG-31 focuses on high speed, altitude, and long-range detection and engagement, prioritizing a different set of operational requirements.

Operational Capabilities: The F-22 excels in stealth, air superiority, and ground attack roles, making it versatile on the modern battlefield. The MiG-31, however, remains unmatched in its niche as a long-range interceptor, capable of engaging targets at distances where most fighters cannot operate effectively.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.