Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

F-4 Phantom II vs. MiG-25

Compare

F-4

vs.

MiG-25

Role
Fighter-bomberInterceptor
Generation
3rd generation3rd generation
National Origin
United StatesSoviet Union
Manufacturer
McDonnell DouglasMikoyan-Gurevich
Price (USD)
$3 Million$3 Million
Primary Users
US NavySoviet Air Defence Forces
First Flight
19581964
Last Production Year
19811984
# Units Built
5,1951,186
Status
RetiredLimited Service
Seats
21
Length
19 m63 ft
23 m78 ft
Wingspan
11 m38 ft
14 m46 ft
Wing Area
49 m²529 ft²
61 m²660 ft²
Height
5 m16 ft
6 m20 ft
Empty Weight
13,757 kg30,330 lbs
19,999 kg44,090 lbs
Gross Weight
18,824 kg41,500 lbs
29,030 kg64,000 lbs
MTOW
28,030 kg61,795 lbs
36,718 kg80,950 lbs
Fuel Capacity
7,257 kg16,000 lbs
14,921 kg32,895 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
General ElectricTumansky
Engine Model
J79-GE-17AR-15B-300
Dry Thrust
53 kN11,905 lbs
74 kN16,500 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
79 kN17,845 lbf
100 kN22,500 lbf
Max Thrust
159 kN35,690 lbf
200 kN45,000 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.23Mach 2.83
Top Speed
2,371 km/h1,473 mph
3,058 km/h1,900 mph
Range
2,815 km1,520 nm
1,852 km1,000 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s41,000 ft/min
208 m/s40,900 ft/min
Ceiling
17,069 m56,000 ft
22,860 m75,000 ft
G Limit
6 g4 g

What Are the Differences Between the F-4 Phantom II and MiG-25

F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-25 Size Comparison

  • At 23.80 meters, the MiG-25 is 4.60 meters longer than the F-4 Phantom II.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-25 is 2.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the MiG-25 is 1.10 meters bigger than that of the F-4 Phantom II’s 5 meters.

F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-25 Price

  • The F-4 Phantom II and the MiG-25 have the same price at $3 Million

F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-25 Speed

  • The MiG-25 has a top speed of 1,900 miles per hour, and the F-4 Phantom II has a top speed of 1,473 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the MiG-25 427 miles per hour faster than the F-4 Phantom II.

About the F-4 Phantom II

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is one of the most significant fighter jets in military aviation history, known for its versatility, powerful performance, and distinctive appearance. Initially developed for the US Navy in the late 1950s, the F-4 Phantom II set numerous speed and altitude records for its time and was later adopted by the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Air Force.

Production History: The F-4 Phantom II was designed to meet the U.S. Navy's need for a supersonic fighter capable of carrying a significant payload over long distances, without sacrificing speed and maneuverability. The aircraft saw extensive combat in the Vietnam War, serving in both ground-attack and air superiority roles. Production ran from 1958 to 1981, with over 5,000 units built, making it one of the most produced American supersonic military aircraft.

Design Features: Characterized by its large size, twin engines, and tandem two-seat configuration, the F-4 Phantom II was designed without an internal cannon in its initial versions, relying instead on missiles for air combat. The F-4's distinctive design included drooping tail fins and diagonal tail wings, contributing to its recognizable silhouette.

Operational History: The F-4 Phantom II saw extensive use in the Vietnam War, where it performed admirably in dogfighting against lighter North Vietnamese aircraft, as well as in bombing missions. It was also a key figure in American air power throughout the Cold War. The F-4 served with distinction in later conflicts such as the Persian Gulf War and remained in use by several countries into the 21st century.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-4 Phantom II vs. F-105 Thunderchief

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were critical to the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. The F-105 was primarily used for deep strike bombing missions, while the F-4 served in a wider range of roles, including air superiority, fleet defense, and reconnaissance.

Performance: The F-105 Thunderchief, known as the "Thud," was the faster of the two at low altitude and carried a larger bomb load for ground-attack missions. However, the F-4 Phantom II's superior agility, higher service ceiling, and ability to operate from carriers made it a more adaptable and formidable aircraft.

F-4 Phantom II vs. MiG-21

Design: The MiG-21 was the Soviet Union's counterpart to the F-4 during the Vietnam War. It was smaller, lighter, and offered greater agility, designed primarily for air superiority with a secondary ground-attack capability. In contrast, the F-4 was a larger, more versatile fighter-bomber that could engage targets at longer ranges with its superior radar and missile armament.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-21's agility made it a formidable adversary in visual range dogfights, while the F-4's powerful engines, advanced avionics, and diverse weapons loadout gave it an edge in beyond-visual-range engagements and multirole missions.

About the MiG-25

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25, known by its NATO reporting name "Foxbat," is a high-speed reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft that was among the fastest military aircraft ever built. Developed by the Soviet Union in the 1960s, the MiG-25 was designed to counter the American Mach 3 XB-70 Valkyrie bomber (which never entered service), and the SR-71 Blackbird reconnaissance aircraft. With its introduction in 1970, the MiG-25 shattered several world records for speed and altitude, showcasing the technological prowess of the Soviet aerospace industry during that era.

Production History: The MiG-25's development began in the early 1960s, with its first flight occurring in 1964. The aircraft entered service in 1970, with production continuing until 1984. Over this period, approximately 1,190 units were built across various variants. The MiG-25's capabilities were so advanced for its time that its existence prompted significant changes in Western military aviation strategy and development programs.

Design Features: The MiG-25 was constructed primarily of stainless steel and nickel-steel alloys, allowing it to withstand the extreme temperatures generated at high speeds. It was powered by two powerful Tumansky R-15 turbojet engines, enabling it to reach speeds of up to Mach 2.83. The aircraft featured a large airframe with a distinctive high-wing layout and twin vertical stabilizers. The MiG-25's armament typically included four air-to-air missiles for the interceptor variants.

Operational History: Although initially intended to intercept high-speed, high-altitude threats, the MiG-25 found its niche as a reconnaissance platform, where its exceptional speed and altitude capabilities could be fully exploited. The aircraft saw service in several Cold War confrontations and regional conflicts, providing critical intelligence and engaging in occasional air-to-air combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-25 vs. SR-71 Blackbird

Role and Capabilities: While Lockheed's SR-71 Blackbird was designed exclusively for strategic reconnaissance at high speeds and altitudes, the MiG-25 served in both reconnaissance and interceptor roles. Both aircraft were capable of outrunning threats with their exceptional speed.

Performance: The MiG-25 could reach similar altitudes and speeds as the SR-71, making it one of the few aircraft capable of posing a threat to the Blackbird. However, the SR-71's range and sophisticated sensors allowed it to conduct longer and more detailed reconnaissance missions.

MiG-25 vs. MiG-31

Design Evolution: The MiG-31 Foxhound was developed as a successor to the MiG-25, incorporating lessons learned from its predecessor's operational history. It featured an improved airframe, more advanced avionics, and the capability to fly at high speeds at lower altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-31 significantly expanded on the MiG-25's interceptor role with its ability to engage multiple targets simultaneously, thanks to its advanced radar and weapons systems. While both aircraft shared exceptional high-speed performance, the MiG-31 offered better overall combat capabilities and versatility.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.