Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs. MiG-23

vs.
Compare

F-16

vs.

MiG-23

Role
Mulitrole fighterFighter
Generation
4th generation3rd generation
National Origin
United StatesSoviet Union
Manufacturer
General DynamicsMikoyan-Gurevich
Price (USD)
$64 Million$6 Million
Primary Users
US Air ForceSoviet Air Forces
First Flight
19741967
Last Production Year
In Production1985
# Units Built
>46005,047
Status
In ServiceLimited Service
Seats
1 (F-16C) / 2 (F-16D)1
Length
15 m49 ft
16 m54 ft
Wingspan
10 m32 ft
14 m45 ft
Wing Area
28 m²301 ft²
37 m²402 ft²
Height
4 m16 ft
4 m15 ft
Empty Weight
8,573 kg18,900 lbs
10,886 kg24,000 lbs
Gross Weight
12,020 kg26,500 lbs
14,842 kg32,720 lbs
MTOW
19,187 kg42,300 lbs
17,799 kg39,240 lbs
Fuel Capacity
3,175 kg7,000 lbs
4,672 kg10,300 lbs
Number of Engines
11
Engine Type
TurbofanTurbojet
Engine Manufacturer
General ElectricKhatchaturov
Engine Model
F110-GE-129R-35-300
Dry Thrust
76 kN17,155 lbs
84 kN18,800 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
131 kN29,500 lbf
127 kN28,660 lbf
Max Thrust
131 kN29,500 lbf
127 kN28,660 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.05Mach 2.35
Top Speed
2,177 km/h1,353 mph
2,499 km/h1,553 mph
Range
4,223 km2,280 nm
1,852 km1,000 nm
Rate of Climb
254 m/s50,000 ft/min
229 m/s45,000 ft/min
Ceiling
17,678 m58,000 ft
18,501 m60,700 ft
G Limit
9 g7 g

What Are the Differences Between the F-16 Fighting Falcon and MiG-23

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs MiG-23 Size Comparison

  • At 16.70 meters, the MiG-23 is 1.60 meters longer than the F-16 Fighting Falcon.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-23 is 4 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the F-16 Fighting Falcon is 0.10 meters bigger than that of the MiG-23’s 4.80 meters.

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs MiG-23 Price

  • The F-16 Fighting Falcon is more expensive than the MiG-23, with a unit cost of approximately 64 million compared to the MiG-23’s unit cost of approximately 6 million.

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs MiG-23 Speed

  • The MiG-23 has a top speed of 1,553 miles per hour, and the F-16 Fighting Falcon has a top speed of 1,353 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the MiG-23 200 miles per hour faster than the F-16 Fighting Falcon.

About the F-16 Fighting Falcon

The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, now produced by Lockheed Martin, is a single-engine, supersonic, multirole fighter aircraft originally developed for the United States Air Force. It was designed as an air superiority day fighter but evolved into a successful all-weather multirole aircraft. Over 4,600 units have been produced since its introduction in the late 1970s, and it remains in service with the USAF and 25 other nations.

Production History: The F-16 was first introduced on 17 August 1978, following its first official flight on 2 February 1974. Initially conceived under the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program, the F-16 was selected for its agility, maneuverability, and versatility. General Dynamics began its production, which was later continued by Lockheed Martin after 1993.

Design Features: Notable for its bubble canopy for better visibility, side-mounted control stick for ease of maneuvering, and an ejection seat inclined 30 degrees to reduce g-force effects on the pilot, the F-16 was pioneering in incorporating fly-by-wire flight control systems, making it one of the most agile fighters of its time. It features an internal M61 Vulcan cannon and can carry numerous missiles and bombs across 11 hardpoints.

Operational History: The F-16 has seen extensive action across numerous conflicts, showcasing its capabilities in air-to-air combat and air-to-surface attacks. It has been a staple in operations such as the 1991 Gulf War, Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The aircraft's versatility has also made it a favorite for the Thunderbirds, the USAF's aerial demonstration team.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs. F/A-18 Hornet

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft are multirole fighters capable of air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. The F-16 is known for its agility in air combat, while the F/A-18 offers additional versatility with carrier operations capability.

Performance: The F-16 boasts a top speed of over Mach 2 and a range of 2,002 miles, making it exceptionally effective in quick strikes and air superiority roles. The F/A-18, while also capable of reaching high speeds and offering significant payload capacity, is optimized for carrier-based operations, providing a blend of speed, firepower, and versatility.

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs. F-35 Lightning II

Technology: The F-35 represents a generational leap in technology with stealth capabilities, advanced sensor fusion, and significantly improved avionics. In contrast, the F-16 is less stealthy but is highly maneuverable and has been continuously upgraded to enhance its combat effectiveness.

Role: While the F-16 was designed as a cost-effective, highly maneuverable multirole fighter, the F-35 is intended to serve multiple roles with a focus on stealth, reconnaissance, ground attack, and air superiority.

About the MiG-23

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger," is a third-generation jet fighter developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1960s. The MiG-23 was designed to meet the need for a more versatile and capable fighter, capable of achieving Mach 2.35 speeds, and was introduced as a successor to the MiG-21. It served in various roles, including interceptor, ground-attack, and scouting.

Production History: The MiG-23 was introduced into service with the Soviet Air Forces in 1970. Over its production life, which spanned two decades, more than 5,000 units were built, making it one of the most produced fighter aircraft of its time. The MiG-23 was exported widely, serving in the air forces of over 30 countries, and saw action in numerous conflicts during the latter half of the 20th century.

Design Features: The MiG-23's most notable feature is its swing-wing design, which allows the wings to be set at different angles to optimize performance at various speeds. At lower speeds, the wings could be extended for better lift and maneuverability, while at higher speeds, they could be swept back to reduce drag. The aircraft was powered by a single large turbojet engine, equipped with an afterburner for additional thrust.

Operational History: The MiG-23 saw combat in several Middle Eastern conflicts, including the Yom Kippur War, the Iran-Iraq War, and the Syrian Civil War. It was used extensively by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, where it was employed in both air-to-air combat and ground-attack roles. Despite its advanced design, the MiG-23 faced challenges in terms of maintenance and operational readiness, particularly in the hands of less experienced air forces.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-23 vs. F-4 Phantom II

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-23 and F-4 Phantom II were designed as multi-role fighters capable of performing both air superiority and ground-attack missions. The MiG-23's variable-geometry wings provided it with a broader performance envelope, especially in terms of speed and altitude capabilities.

Performance: The F-4 Phantom II, while older, was known for its reliability, heavy payload, and versatility. In contrast, the MiG-23 offered better agility at high speeds and a more sophisticated radar and missile armament for air-to-air engagements.

MiG-23 vs. F-14 Tomcat

Design Evolution: The F-14 Tomcat and the MiG-23 were both developed around the same time and featured variable-geometry wings. This design was chosen by both manufacturers for similar reasons: to provide excellent performance across a wide range of speeds and altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The F-14 was primarily designed as a fleet defense interceptor for the U.S. Navy and excelled in long-range air-to-air engagements. The MiG-23, while also capable in the interceptor role, was more versatile, being used extensively in ground-attack missions in addition to air superiority roles.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.