Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs. Embraer E195

vs.
Compare

DC-9-30

vs.

E195

Price (USD)
$10 Million$40 Million
First Flight
19662004
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
38 m126 ft
Wingspan
28 m93 ft
28 m94 ft
Wing Area
93 m²1,001 ft²
92 m²995 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m11 ft
2 m9 ft
Height
8 m27 ft
10 m34 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
52,300 kg115,302 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney JT8DGeneral Electric GE34
Max Thrust Per Engine
67 kN15,000 lbf
89 kN20,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
134 kN30,000 lbf
178 kN40,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
13,900 l3,672 gal
16,150 l4,266 gal
Range
2,800 km1,512 nm
4,260 km2,300 nm
Cruise Speed
897 km/h557 mph
829 km/h515 mph
Typical Seating
115 pax116 pax
Max Seating
127 pax124 pax

What Are the Differences Between the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 and Embraer E195

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E195 Size Comparison

  • At 38.70 meters, the Embraer E195 is 2.30 meters longer than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.
  • With a wingspan of 28.70 meters, the Embraer E195 is 0.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 and Embraer E195 have heights of 8.50 meters and 10.50 meters respectively - making the Embraer E195 2 meters taller.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E195 Range

  • Embraer E195’s range of 4,260 kilometers is greater than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers. Therefore, the Embraer E195 can fly nonstop approximately 1,460 kilometers further.
  • The Embraer E195 can hold 4,266 gallons of fuel, which is 594 gallons more than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s tank capacity of 3,672 gallons.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E195 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Embraer E195 can accommodate 116 passengers, which is about 1 passengers more than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s seating capacity.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s max seating capacity is 127 passengers, compared to 124 passengers of the Embraer E195.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

About the Embraer E195

The Embraer E195, the largest E-Jet family member, is a narrow-body regional jet designed to fulfill a specific role in the aviation market. Launched in 2004, the E195 addresses the demand for an aircraft that bridges the gap between regional and mainline capabilities, offering increased passenger capacity and extended range.

The E195's fuselage stretches 38.7 meters (126.8 feet), and its wings span 28.7 meters (94.2 feet). This length enables the aircraft to offer a more spacious cabin, catering to higher passenger loads while maintaining the operational efficiency of a regional jet. The E195's fuel capacity stands at 16,150 liters (4,266 US gallons), a feature that extends its operational range to approximately 4,260 kilometers (2,300 nautical miles). This capability allows airlines to deploy the E195 on a wider variety of routes, from dense, short-haul segments to thinner, longer distances that are typically beyond the reach of traditional regional jets.

Cruising at a speed of 829 km/h (515 mph), the E195 ensures timely and efficient travel, aligning with the quick turnaround and schedule demands of regional airlines. The aircraft's seating capacity ranges from 116 passengers in a standard configuration to a maximum of 124 in a denser layout. This flexibility enables airlines to optimize the aircraft for different market demands and passenger volumes. With a maximum takeoff weight of 52,600 kg (115,963 lbs), the E195 is built to handle significant payloads, further demonstrating its suitability for varied operational requirements. The aircraft's size and performance characteristics position it as an attractive option for airlines looking to expand their regional operations with a larger and more capable jet.

In comparison with other regional aircraft, the E195 competes with the Bombardier CRJ-1000, Airbus A220, Airbus A318, and Boeing 717. Operators of the E195, including Azul Brazilian Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines, and Lufthansa CityLine, have capitalized on these attributes to effectively serve their regional networks.

The Embraer E195 has established itself as a key player in the regional aviation sector, providing a versatile and efficient solution for airlines seeking to balance capacity and range in their fleet. Its introduction and continued operation reflect its alignment with the evolving needs of regional air travel.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.