Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs. Embraer E175

vs.
Compare

DC-9-30

vs.

E175

Price (USD)
$10 Million$28 Million
First Flight
19662003
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
31 m103 ft
Wingspan
28 m93 ft
26 m85 ft
Wing Area
93 m²1,001 ft²
72 m²782 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m11 ft
2 m9 ft
Height
8 m27 ft
9 m32 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
40,400 kg89,067 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney JT8DGeneral Electric GE34
Max Thrust Per Engine
67 kN15,000 lbf
63 kN14,200 lbf
Max Total Thrust
134 kN30,000 lbf
126 kN28,400 lbf
Fuel Capacity
13,900 l3,672 gal
11,625 l3,071 gal
Range
2,800 km1,512 nm
4,074 km2,200 nm
Cruise Speed
897 km/h557 mph
797 km/h495 mph
Typical Seating
115 pax78 pax
Max Seating
127 pax88 pax

What Are the Differences Between the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 and Embraer E175

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E175 Size Comparison

  • At 36.40 meters, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 is 4.70 meters longer than the Embraer E175.
  • With a wingspan of 28.40 meters, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 is 2.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 and Embraer E175 have heights of 8.50 meters and 9.90 meters respectively - making the Embraer E175 1.40 meters taller.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E175 Range

  • Embraer E175’s range of 4,074 kilometers is greater than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers. Therefore, the Embraer E175 can fly nonstop approximately 1,274 kilometers further.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 can hold 3,672 gallons of fuel, which is 601 gallons more than the Embraer E175’s tank capacity of 3,071 gallons.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 vs Embraer E175 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 can accommodate 115 passengers, which is about 37 passengers more than Embraer E175’s seating capacity.
  • The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s max seating capacity is 127 passengers, compared to 88 passengers of the Embraer E175.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

About the Embraer E175

The Embraer E175, a member of the E-Jet family, is a narrow-body regional jet introduced in 2003. This aircraft was designed as part of Embraer's strategy to offer diverse solutions in the regional jet market, with a focus on balancing operational efficiency and passenger comfort for short to medium-haul routes.

The E175 extends 31.7 meters (103.9 feet) in length, slightly longer than its predecessor, the E170. This additional length allows for increased seating capacity, accommodating up to 88 passengers. The wingspan of 26.0 meters (85.3 feet) and a wing area of 72.7 square meters (782.8 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's optimized aerodynamic performance, particularly beneficial for operations in varied regional environments.

Equipped with two GE engines providing a combined thrust of 126.0 kN (28,400 lbf), the E175 has an enhanced range of approximately 4,074 kilometers (2,200 nautical miles). This range, coupled with the aircraft's efficient fuel consumption, positions the E175 as an attractive option for airlines to connect regional destinations effectively. The E175's interior is designed with an emphasis on passenger experience, featuring comfortable seating, larger windows, and modern in-flight entertainment systems. The layout is also tailored for quick boarding and disembarking, aligning with the operational needs of regional air travel.

In the regional aircraft market, the Embraer E175 competes with Bombardier's CRJ-900. This segment was previously occupied by the earlier BAe 146 and Fokker 70. The E175's introduction provided airlines with a versatile aircraft that combines the comfort and amenities of larger jets with the economics and flexibility of regional operations. Airlines operating the Embraer E175 include American Eagle, Delta Connection, and Republic Airways. These carriers have incorporated the E175 into their fleets to serve diverse regional routes, taking advantage of its operational efficiency, range, and passenger appeal. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrates its adaptability to various route structures and its capacity to offer a comfortable travel experience on regional journeys. As of 2023, the E175 is still in production, with strong demand from regional carriers in the US.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.