Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A350-900 vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

A350-900

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$317 Million$20 Million
First Flight
20131984
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
66 m219 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
64 m212 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
442 m²4,757 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
6 m19 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
17 m55 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
283,000 kg623,908 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce Trent XWBPratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
330 kN74,000 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
660 kN148,000 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
141,000 l37,248 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
15,372 km8,300 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
905 km/h562 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
319 pax44 pax
Max Seating
440 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A350-900 and ATR 42-600

Airbus A350-900 vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 66.80 meters, the Airbus A350-900 is 44.10 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 64.80 meters, the Airbus A350-900 is 40.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A350-900 and ATR 42-600 have heights of 17.10 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Airbus A350-900 9.50 meters taller.

Airbus A350-900 vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Airbus A350-900’s range of 15,372 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A350-900 can fly nonstop approximately 14,046 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A350-900 can hold 37,248 gallons of fuel, which is 35,734 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Airbus A350-900 vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A350-900 can accommodate 319 passengers, which is about 275 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A350-900’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Airbus A350-900

Launched in 2013, the Airbus A350-900 is a long-haul, wide-body aircraft designed for high-capacity travel. The modern twin-engine aircraft offers a combination of range, comfort, and fuel efficiency.

The A350-900, with a length of 219.2 feet (66.8 meters) and a wingspan of 212.4 feet (64.8 meters), stands out for its considerable size. Its wing area of 4,757.6 square feet (442.0 square meters) contributes to its aerodynamic efficiency. The aircraft accommodates 319 passengers in a typical three-class configuration. Its design prioritizes passenger comfort, incorporating features such as a quieter cabin and advanced air systems for a more pleasant travel experience. Equipped with Trent XWB turbofan engines that deliver a total thrust of 148,000 lbf (660.0 kN), the A350-900 boasts significant fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact. With a fuel capacity of 37,248 US gallons (141,000 liters), the aircraft achieves a range of 8,300 nautical miles (15,372 kilometers), enabling airlines to operate on extensive long-haul routes without stopovers.

In the competitive field of wide-body aircraft, the A350-900 challenges models like the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and the Boeing 777-200ER. It is recognized for its innovative use of materials, including extensive carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer, which contributes to weight reduction and overall efficiency. Key operators of the Airbus A350-900, such as Qatar Airways, Cathay Pacific, Lufthansa, and Delta Air Lines have utilized the aircraft for its operational flexibility and economic performance. The A350-900 serves a variety of long-range routes from domestic cross-country flights to international long-haul routes.

The Airbus A350-900's introduction into the market was a significant step in Airbus's strategy to offer cutting-edge, efficient aircraft. Its development reflects the manufacturer's response to airlines' demands for sustainable, high-capacity, and long-range travel solutions.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.