Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A330-300 vs. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

vs.
Compare

A330-300

vs.

DC-9-30

Price (USD)
$256 Million$10 Million
First Flight
19921966
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
63 m208 ft
36 m119 ft
Wingspan
60 m197 ft
28 m93 ft
Wing Area
361 m²3,892 ft²
93 m²1,001 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m18 ft
3 m11 ft
Height
16 m55 ft
8 m27 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
242,000 kg533,519 lbs
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / Rolls-Royce Trent 700Pratt & Whitney JT8D
Max Thrust Per Engine
316 kN71,100 lbf
67 kN15,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
632 kN142,200 lbf
134 kN30,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
139,090 l36,744 gal
13,900 l3,672 gal
Range
11,750 km6,344 nm
2,800 km1,512 nm
Cruise Speed
870 km/h541 mph
897 km/h557 mph
Typical Seating
290 pax115 pax
Max Seating
440 pax127 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A330-300 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

Airbus A330-300 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Size Comparison

  • At 63.70 meters, the Airbus A330-300 is 27.30 meters longer than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.
  • With a wingspan of 60.30 meters, the Airbus A330-300 is 31.90 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A330-300 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 have heights of 16.80 meters and 8.50 meters respectively - making the Airbus A330-300 8.30 meters taller.

Airbus A330-300 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Range

  • Airbus A330-300’s range of 11,750 kilometers is greater than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A330-300 can fly nonstop approximately 8,950 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A330-300 can hold 36,744 gallons of fuel, which is 33,072 gallons more than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s tank capacity of 3,672 gallons.

Airbus A330-300 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A330-300 can accommodate 290 passengers, which is about 175 passengers more than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A330-300’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 127 passengers of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.

About the Airbus A330-300

The Airbus A330-300, launched in the early 1990s, was the first variant of the A330 series. This wide-body, twin-engine aircraft was developed to address the requirements of medium to long-haul flights, offering a blend of capacity and range that has been appealing to airlines globally.

The A330-300 extends to a length of 208.9 feet (63.7 meters), with a wingspan of 197.8 feet (60.3 meters). It typically seats around 277 passengers in a standard three-class layout, with the flexibility to accommodate more in higher-density configurations. The spacious and adaptable cabin has been a key selling point, providing airlines with the ability to tailor the passenger experience to different market segments. Equipped with engines from Rolls-Royce, Pratt & Whitney, or General Electric, the A330-300 is known for its reliable and efficient performance. It has a maximum takeoff weight of about 533,500 lbs and can travel up to 6,350 nautical miles, enabling airlines to serve a wide range of international destinations. From the outside, the A330 is most distinguishable by its boxy winglets, wing-mounted fuel tanks, and tilted landing gear. On the inside, it seats eight-abreast, with a 2–4–2 economy class. Overall, it shares many design features from the A340 and A300.

Prominent operators of the Airbus A330-300 include Cathay Pacific, Turkish Airlines, Scandinavian Airlines, Saudia, and Delta Air Lines. These airlines have leveraged the aircraft's capacity and range for various operational needs, utilizing it for both high-density domestic flights and longer international services. The development of the A330-300 was driven by airline demand for a high-capacity, efficient, and versatile aircraft. Its operational role has been shaped by its ability to efficiently serve long-haul routes with significant passenger loads, meeting the evolving needs of the global aviation market.

Today, the Airbus A330-300 remains a vital component in the fleets of various airlines, a testament to its enduring utility and appeal. Its combination of passenger capacity, operational range, and efficiency continues to make it a valuable asset for airlines navigating the complexities of modern air travel. It most closely completes with the 767-400ER and 787-9 from Boeing.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.