Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A321-200 vs. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

vs.
Compare

A321-200

vs.

DC-9-30

Price (USD)
$115 Million$10 Million
First Flight
19961966
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
44 m146 ft
36 m119 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
28 m93 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
93 m²1,001 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
3 m11 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
8 m27 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
93,500 kg206,132 lbs
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56 / IAE V2500Pratt & Whitney JT8D
Max Thrust Per Engine
142 kN32,000 lbf
67 kN15,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
284 kN64,000 lbf
134 kN30,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
30,030 l7,933 gal
13,900 l3,672 gal
Range
5,950 km3,213 nm
2,800 km1,512 nm
Cruise Speed
840 km/h522 mph
897 km/h557 mph
Typical Seating
185 pax115 pax
Max Seating
220 pax127 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A321-200 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

Airbus A321-200 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Size Comparison

  • At 44.50 meters, the Airbus A321-200 is 8.10 meters longer than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A321-200 is 7.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A321-200 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 have heights of 11.80 meters and 8.50 meters respectively - making the Airbus A321-200 3.30 meters taller.

Airbus A321-200 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Range

  • Airbus A321-200’s range of 5,950 kilometers is greater than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A321-200 can fly nonstop approximately 3,150 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A321-200 can hold 7,933 gallons of fuel, which is 4,261 gallons more than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s tank capacity of 3,672 gallons.

Airbus A321-200 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A321-200 can accommodate 185 passengers, which is about 70 passengers more than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A321-200’s max seating capacity is 220 passengers, compared to 127 passengers of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.

About the Airbus A321-200

The Airbus A321-200, an extended version within the Airbus A320 family, stands out as a narrow-body, twin-engine aircraft tailored for medium to long-haul flights. This variant distinguishes itself from the A321 with enhanced range and payload capabilities.

Spanning 146.5 feet (44.6 meters) in length and with a wingspan of 117.5 feet (35.8 meters), the A321-200 has the distinction of being the longest aircraft in the A320 family. It accommodates up to 220 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, with options for denser seating in single-class layouts. This model has been particularly noted for its stretched fuselage, which allows for more seating without significantly increasing operational costs. Thanks to its Door-Over-Wing (DOW) exit design, the aircraft was able to increase passenger capacity while adhering to safety regulations. The A321-200 is powered by CFM56 or IAE V2500 engines, known for their reliability and efficiency. It has a maximum takeoff weight of about 206,000 lbs and can cover distances up to 3,200 nautical miles (5,930 kilometers). Equipped with Airbus's innovative fly-by-wire system and a glass cockpit, the A321-200 reflects the technological lineage of the A320 family. These systems contribute to enhanced pilot control and navigational accuracy.

Key operators of the Airbus A321-200 include American Airlines, Lufthansa, and British Airways. Each airline has utilized the A321-200 in ways that leverage its specific capacities and range, from transcontinental routes to high-traffic short-haul flights. The Airbus A321-200's development was partly driven by airline demand for a more efficient and higher capacity aircraft within the single-aisle market. One of the notable achievements of the A321-200 is its operational flexibility, which has allowed airlines to deploy it on a variety of routes, optimizing for both passenger volume and flight distance.

In operational use, the A321-200 has been recognized for its ability to effectively serve both densely trafficked routes and specialized markets requiring additional range. This flexibility makes it a valuable asset in the fleets of airlines looking to balance capacity and efficiency in their operations.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.