Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A320-200 vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

A320-200

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$101 Million$20 Million
First Flight
19871984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
37 m123 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
78,000 kg171,961 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CMFI CFM56 / IAE V2500Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
120 kN27,000 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
240 kN54,000 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
27,200 l7,185 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
6,200 km3,348 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
840 km/h522 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
170 pax44 pax
Max Seating
180 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A320-200 and ATR 42-600

Airbus A320-200 vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 37.60 meters, the Airbus A320-200 is 14.90 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A320-200 is 11.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A320-200 and ATR 42-600 have heights of 11.80 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Airbus A320-200 4.20 meters taller.

Airbus A320-200 vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Airbus A320-200’s range of 6,200 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A320-200 can fly nonstop approximately 4,874 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A320-200 can hold 7,185 gallons of fuel, which is 5,671 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Airbus A320-200 vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A320-200 can accommodate 170 passengers, which is about 126 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A320-200’s max seating capacity is 180 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Airbus A320-200

The Airbus A320-200 is a narrow-body, twin-engine aircraft, primarily employed for short to medium-haul flights. Introduced in the late 1980s, this model was designed with an emphasis on increased fuel capacity and range.

With dimensions of 123.3 feet (37.6 meters) in length and a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A320-200 is configured typically to accommodate 150 to 180 passengers in a standard two-class layout. This seating capacity enables the aircraft to efficiently serve both high-density and lower-demand routes. The A320-200 incorporates fly-by-wire technology, a notable feature in commercial aviation at the time of its introduction, replacing traditional manual flight controls with an electronic interface. The aircraft is equipped with advanced avionics and an electronic flight instrument system in the cockpit, reflecting the technological standards of the era. Powered by CFM56 or IAE V2500 engines, the -200 variant is designed for a balance of thrust and fuel efficiency. It has a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 170,000 lbs and a range of about 3,300 nautical miles, dependent on load and configuration.

Several airlines have incorporated the Airbus A320-200 into their fleets, utilizing it for a variety of operational needs. Prominent operators include Lufthansa, British Airways, and AirAsia. These carriers have employed the jetliner for its ability to efficiently handle both short domestic services and longer intercontinental routes. As a key variant in the A320 family, the Airbus A320-200 has contributed to Airbus's presence in the narrow-body aircraft market. Its use by various airlines demonstrates its functionality across different types of commercial aviation operations.

Today, the Airbus A320-200 continues to be an operational part of numerous airline fleets, fulfilling its intended roles across various route networks. While no longer in production, it is succeeded by the newer A320neo.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.