Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A319 vs. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

vs.
Compare

A319

vs.

DC-9-30

Price (USD)
$92 Million$10 Million
First Flight
19951966
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
33 m111 ft
36 m119 ft
Wingspan
35 m117 ft
28 m93 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
93 m²1,001 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
3 m11 ft
Height
11 m38 ft
8 m27 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
75,500 kg166,449 lbs
48,988 kg108,000 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56 / IAE V2500Pratt & Whitney JT8D
Max Thrust Per Engine
120 kN27,000 lbf
67 kN15,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
240 kN54,000 lbf
134 kN30,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
30,190 l7,975 gal
13,900 l3,672 gal
Range
6,950 km3,753 nm
2,800 km1,512 nm
Cruise Speed
830 km/h516 mph
897 km/h557 mph
Typical Seating
140 pax115 pax
Max Seating
156 pax127 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A319 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

Airbus A319 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Size Comparison

  • At 36.40 meters, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 is 2.60 meters longer than the Airbus A319.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A319 is 7.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A319 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 have heights of 11.80 meters and 8.50 meters respectively - making the Airbus A319 3.30 meters taller.

Airbus A319 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Range

  • Airbus A319’s range of 6,950 kilometers is greater than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s range of 2,800 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A319 can fly nonstop approximately 4,150 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A319 can hold 7,975 gallons of fuel, which is 4,303 gallons more than the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s tank capacity of 3,672 gallons.

Airbus A319 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A319 can accommodate 140 passengers, which is about 25 passengers more than McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A319’s max seating capacity is 156 passengers, compared to 127 passengers of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30.

About the Airbus A319

The Airbus A319, a member of the renowned Airbus A320 family, is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for short to medium-haul routes. Launched in the mid-1990s, the A319 was developed as a shorter variant of the A320, offering airlines a versatile aircraft for routes with lower passenger demand, without sacrificing range and efficiency.

With a length of 111 feet (33.8 meters) and a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A319 is more compact than the A320, allowing for greater flexibility in airport operations, particularly in constrained or noise-sensitive environments. The aircraft typically accommodates around 140 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, though it can be configured for up to 160 passengers in a high-density layout. Powered by either CFM56-5B or IAE V2500 engines, the A319 delivers efficient performance, supporting a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 166,000 lbs. The aircraft's range extends up to 3,750 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration, allowing for considerable route flexibility, including transcontinental operations. The A319 shares the same pioneering technology as its A320 family counterparts, including Airbus's fly-by-wire control system and an advanced glass cockpit. These features not only enhance operational efficiency and safety but also ensure commonality across the A320 family, reducing training and maintenance costs for airlines.

Airlines around the world have incorporated the Airbus A319 into their fleets, valuing its combination of efficiency, capacity, and range. Operators such as EasyJet, American Airlines, and Lufthansa have deployed the A319 across a wide spectrum of routes, taking advantage of its ability to efficiently serve both short-haul and longer regional operations. The Airbus A319's introduction to the market underscored Airbus's commitment to providing a diverse range of aircraft to meet various airline needs. Its role in the A320 family is characterized by its ability to offer the same advanced technology and performance in a smaller, more versatile package.

The A319 continues to be a significant player in the narrow-body aircraft market, demonstrating its ongoing relevance in the commercial aviation industry. Its versatility and efficiency make it a valuable asset for airlines seeking to optimize their operations and provide quality air travel experiences.

About the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30, a narrow-body jet airliner first introduced in 1966, stands as a significant aircraft in the evolution of commercial aviation. Designed during an era of rapid growth in air travel, the DC-9-30 was developed to meet the demands of short to medium-haul routes, offering airlines a more efficient and practical alternative to the larger jetliners of the time. The Series 30 of the DC-9 included four main sub-variants, -31, -32, -33, and -34. During its production, the -30 was by far the most popular model of the DC-9 with 585 units delivered.

This aircraft was initially developed as the Douglas DC-9, prior to August 1967 merger with McDonnell Aircraft. The DC-9-30 measures in at 36.4 meters (119.3 feet) in length. This size enabled it to operate efficiently in smaller airports and on shorter runways - a niche that was underserved at the time of its introduction. Powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney PWJTD engines, the DC-9-30 has a total thrust output of 134.0 kN (30,000 lbf). Its fuel capacity of 13,900 liters (3,672 US gallons) gives the DC-9-30 a range of approximately 2,800 kilometers (1,512 nautical miles). This range was particularly advantageous for airlines looking to serve regional networks with an efficient and reliable jet.

The DC-9-30's typical five abreast seating layout can fit around 115 passengers, with a maximum of 127 in a high-density layout.

In its market segment, the McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30 was a key competitor to other short-haul aircraft of the era. Its introduction provided airlines with a jetliner that was not only smaller and more versatile than the larger, long-haul aircraft but also more efficient and economical for short to medium-range routes.

Airlines such as Delta Air Lines, Eastern Air Lines, and TWA were prominent operators of the DC-9-30, utilizing its capabilities to enhance their regional route networks. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrated its effectiveness in bridging the gap between propeller-driven airliners and larger jets, contributing significantly to the growth of regional air travel.

The McDonnel Douglas DC-9-30's production and service history highlight its importance as a practical and versatile aircraft in commercial aviation. The last DC-9 to ever be built was delivered in 1982. After its retirement, McDonnell Douglas went on to produce the MD-80 and the MD-95.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.