Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A318 vs. ATR 42-600

Compare

A318

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$77 Million$20 Million
First Flight
20021984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
31 m103 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
34 m111 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
122 m²1,317 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
4 m13 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
68,000 kg149,914 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56 / Pratt & Whitney PW6000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
106 kN24,000 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
212 kN48,000 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
24,210 l6,396 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
5,750 km3,105 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
830 km/h516 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
110 pax44 pax
Max Seating
132 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A318 and ATR 42-600

Airbus A318 vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 31.40 meters, the Airbus A318 is 8.70 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 34.10 meters, the Airbus A318 is 9.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A318 and ATR 42-600 have heights of 12.60 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Airbus A318 5 meters taller.

Airbus A318 vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Airbus A318’s range of 5,750 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A318 can fly nonstop approximately 4,424 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A318 can hold 6,396 gallons of fuel, which is 4,882 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Airbus A318 vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A318 can accommodate 110 passengers, which is about 66 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A318’s max seating capacity is 132 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Airbus A318

The Airbus A318, the smallest member of the Airbus A320 family, is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for short to medium-haul routes. Introduced in the early 2000s, the A318 was developed to meet the needs of airlines for a smaller aircraft that could operate in restricted airports and on less densely populated routes, without compromising on range and efficiency.

Measuring 103.2 feet (31.4 meters) in length with a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A318 is significantly shorter than its A320 family counterparts. This compact size allows the aircraft to operate at airports with stringent noise and space constraints. Despite its smaller size, the A318 offers a standard seating arrangement for 110 passengers in a two-class configuration, making it an optimal choice for airlines looking to serve regional markets with a high-quality passenger experience. Equipped with either CFM56-5B or Pratt & Whitney PW6000 engines, the A318 provides sufficient thrust to support a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 130,000 lbs. The aircraft's range is around 3,100 nautical miles, depending on the specific model and configuration, allowing for a variety of route options including transcontinental flights. The A318's design includes many of the technological advancements found in the A320 family, such as Airbus's pioneering fly-by-wire control system and a modern glass cockpit. These features enhance the aircraft's operational efficiency and safety, while also ensuring commonality with other members of the A320 family, a significant advantage for airlines in terms of crew training and fleet management.

Throughout its production, the Airbus A318 saw orders from several airlines, including Air France and British Airways. These carriers have utilized the A318 for its intended operational roles, capitalizing on its ability to serve smaller markets and city-center airports, like London City Airport, where the aircraft's steep approach capability is particularly beneficial. The A318's role in the Airbus lineup highlights the manufacturer's dedication to offering a comprehensive range of aircraft to meet various airline requirements. While it is the smallest in the A320 family, the A318 continues to fulfill a unique niche in the market, providing airlines with a versatile and efficient option for regional and short-haul routes.

The Airbus A318 remains a testament to the adaptability and innovation of the A320 family, demonstrating Airbus's ability to scale its successful designs to meet diverse market demands. Though its production numbers were modest compared to other family members, the A318's contribution to the narrow-body segment is acknowledged for its specialized applications and operational flexibility.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.