Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Airbus A310 vs. Embraer E175

Compare

A310

vs.

E175

Price (USD)
$60 Million$28 Million
First Flight
19822003
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
46 m152 ft
31 m103 ft
Wingspan
43 m144 ft
26 m85 ft
Wing Area
219 m²2,357 ft²
72 m²782 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m18 ft
2 m9 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
9 m32 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
157,000 kg346,126 lbs
40,400 kg89,067 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney PW4000General Electric GE34
Max Thrust Per Engine
262 kN59,000 lbf
63 kN14,200 lbf
Max Total Thrust
524 kN118,000 lbf
126 kN28,400 lbf
Fuel Capacity
61,070 l16,133 gal
11,625 l3,071 gal
Range
8,050 km4,347 nm
4,074 km2,200 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
797 km/h495 mph
Typical Seating
220 pax78 pax
Max Seating
230 pax88 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Airbus A310 and Embraer E175

Airbus A310 vs Embraer E175 Size Comparison

  • At 46.60 meters, the Airbus A310 is 14.90 meters longer than the Embraer E175.
  • With a wingspan of 43.90 meters, the Airbus A310 is 17.90 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Airbus A310 and Embraer E175 have heights of 15.80 meters and 9.90 meters respectively - making the Airbus A310 5.90 meters taller.

Airbus A310 vs Embraer E175 Range

  • Airbus A310’s range of 8,050 kilometers is greater than Embraer E175’s range of 4,074 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A310 can fly nonstop approximately 3,976 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A310 can hold 16,133 gallons of fuel, which is 13,062 gallons more than the Embraer E175’s tank capacity of 3,071 gallons.

Airbus A310 vs Embraer E175 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A310 can accommodate 220 passengers, which is about 142 passengers more than Embraer E175’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A310’s max seating capacity is 230 passengers, compared to 88 passengers of the Embraer E175.

About the Airbus A310

The Airbus A310 is a wide-body, twin-engine jetliner developed by Airbus in the early 1980s as a smaller variant of the A300, its first airliner. The A310 was designed to meet the demands of airlines for a smaller, more efficient aircraft for medium to long-haul routes. This development marked Airbus's expansion in the wide-body aircraft market, offering a versatile option for various airline operations.

With a length of 153 feet (46.7 meters) and a wingspan of 144 feet (43.9 meters), the A310 is notably smaller than the A300, making it suitable for routes with lower passenger demand. The aircraft typically accommodates around 220 passengers in a standard three-class configuration, though it can be configured to carry more in a high-density layout. This flexibility in seating allows airlines to optimize the A310 for both high passenger volume short-haul flights and longer, less densely populated routes.

The A310's design incorporates significant advancements over the A300, including a shortened fuselage and redesigned wing, which contribute to its improved aerodynamics and fuel efficiency. It is equipped with either General Electric CF6-80 or Pratt & Whitney JT9D engines, providing a balance of power and efficiency. The A310 has a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 336,000 lbs and a range of up to 4,350 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration. Inside, the A310 offers a comfortable passenger experience with a spacious cabin and advanced features for its time, such as an optional two-crew glass cockpit. This innovative cockpit design reduced the flight crew requirement from three to two, a significant shift in commercial aviation operations.

The Airbus A310 was well-received in the commercial aviation market, with orders from several airlines worldwide. Notable operators included Lufthansa, Air France, and KLM, among others. These airlines utilized the A310 for its intended purpose, taking advantage of its capacity and range for diverse route networks. The A310's production and service history reflect its role in the evolution of Airbus's wide-body offerings. It bridged the gap between the larger A300 and the later A330 and A340 models, demonstrating Airbus's capability to adapt to market needs. The A310 was instrumental in establishing Airbus as a major competitor in the wide-body aircraft segment.

Though production of the A310 has ceased, its legacy continues in the aviation industry. The aircraft is remembered for its contributions to the development of wide-body jets, particularly in terms of efficiency, versatility, and technological advancements in aircraft design.

About the Embraer E175

The Embraer E175, a member of the E-Jet family, is a narrow-body regional jet introduced in 2003. This aircraft was designed as part of Embraer's strategy to offer diverse solutions in the regional jet market, with a focus on balancing operational efficiency and passenger comfort for short to medium-haul routes.

The E175 extends 31.7 meters (103.9 feet) in length, slightly longer than its predecessor, the E170. This additional length allows for increased seating capacity, accommodating up to 88 passengers. The wingspan of 26.0 meters (85.3 feet) and a wing area of 72.7 square meters (782.8 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's optimized aerodynamic performance, particularly beneficial for operations in varied regional environments.

Equipped with two GE engines providing a combined thrust of 126.0 kN (28,400 lbf), the E175 has an enhanced range of approximately 4,074 kilometers (2,200 nautical miles). This range, coupled with the aircraft's efficient fuel consumption, positions the E175 as an attractive option for airlines to connect regional destinations effectively. The E175's interior is designed with an emphasis on passenger experience, featuring comfortable seating, larger windows, and modern in-flight entertainment systems. The layout is also tailored for quick boarding and disembarking, aligning with the operational needs of regional air travel.

In the regional aircraft market, the Embraer E175 competes with Bombardier's CRJ-900. This segment was previously occupied by the earlier BAe 146 and Fokker 70. The E175's introduction provided airlines with a versatile aircraft that combines the comfort and amenities of larger jets with the economics and flexibility of regional operations. Airlines operating the Embraer E175 include American Eagle, Delta Connection, and Republic Airways. These carriers have incorporated the E175 into their fleets to serve diverse regional routes, taking advantage of its operational efficiency, range, and passenger appeal. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrates its adaptability to various route structures and its capacity to offer a comfortable travel experience on regional journeys. As of 2023, the E175 is still in production, with strong demand from regional carriers in the US.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.