Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-400ER vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

767-400ER

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$115 Million$20 Million
First Flight
20001984
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
61 m201 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
51 m170 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
290 m²3,129 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
16 m55 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
204,100 kg449,963 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney 4000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
270 kN60,600 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
540 kN121,200 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
10,400 km5,616 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
296 pax44 pax
Max Seating
375 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-400ER and ATR 42-600

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 61.40 meters, the Boeing 767-400ER is 38.70 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 51.90 meters, the Boeing 767-400ER is 27.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER and ATR 42-600 have heights of 16.90 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-400ER 9.30 meters taller.

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Boeing 767-400ER’s range of 10,400 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-400ER can fly nonstop approximately 9,074 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 22,446 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Boeing 767-400ER vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-400ER can accommodate 296 passengers, which is about 252 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-400ER’s max seating capacity is 375 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Boeing 767-400ER

The Boeing 767-400ER is an advanced, wide-body aircraft developed by Boeing as part of the evolution of the 767. Introduced at the beginning of the 21st century, this variant is an extension of the popular 767 family, designed to address the increasing demands of the airline industry for higher capacity and extended range.

As a later addition to the 767 series, the -400ER variant built upon the established reputation of its predecessors by offering enhancements in both size and performance. The development and subsequent introduction of this model into the commercial market were part of Boeing's strategic response to the competitive dynamics of the aviation industry. The 767-400ER's production started in the late 1990s, with the aim of providing airlines with an aircraft that combined operational efficiency with increased passenger capacity.

The aircraft measures 61.4 meters (201.3 feet) in length, featuring an extended fuselage to accommodate more passengers. The wingspan of the 767-400ER is 51.9 meters (170.3 feet), and it has a wing area of 290.7 square meters (3129.1 square feet). These dimensions contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic efficiency, particularly important for long-distance travel. Equipped with a choice of General Electric CF6 or Pratt & Whitney 4000 series engines, the 767-400ER offers robust performance with a total maximum thrust of 540.0 kN (121,200 lbf). This thrust capacity, combined with a fuel storage of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), enables the aircraft to cover a range of about 10,400 kilometers (5,616 nautical miles), making it well-suited for extended-range operations.

In terms of passenger capacity, the typical layout of the 767-400ER seats up to 296 passengers, with a maximum capacity of 375 passengers in a high-density configuration. The cabin is generally arranged in a dual-class setup, featuring a standard 7 abreast, 2-3-2 seat arrangement in economy class.

Competing with the Airbus A330-200, the 767-400ER was introduced to provide airlines with a modernized option of the 767, balancing the familiar operational characteristics of its predecessors with the needs of contemporary long-haul travel. Notable airlines of the Boeing 767-400ER include Continental (United Airlines) and Delta Air Lines. The aircraft's combination of extended fuselage, increased passenger capacity, and range efficiency mark it as a significant evolution within the 767 family, catering to the specific requirements of modern commercial aviation. Only 37 units of the -400ER were ever produced.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.