Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$105 Million$20 Million
First Flight
19861984
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
54 m180 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax44 pax
Max Seating
351 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and ATR 42-600

Boeing 767-300ER vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 32.20 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 23 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and ATR 42-600 have heights of 15.80 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 8.20 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 9,744 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 22,446 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 217 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.