Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. Airbus A350-900

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

A350-900

Price (USD)
$105 Million$317 Million
First Flight
19862013
Body Type
Wide-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m180 ft
66 m219 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
64 m212 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
442 m²4,757 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
6 m19 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
17 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
283,000 kg623,908 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
330 kN74,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
660 kN148,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
141,000 l37,248 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
15,372 km8,300 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
905 km/h562 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax319 pax
Max Seating
351 pax440 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A350-900

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A350-900 Size Comparison

  • At 66.80 meters, the Airbus A350-900 is 11.90 meters longer than the Boeing 767-300ER.
  • With a wingspan of 64.80 meters, the Airbus A350-900 is 17.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A350-900 have heights of 15.80 meters and 17.10 meters respectively - making the Airbus A350-900 1.30 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A350-900 Range

  • Airbus A350-900’s range of 15,372 kilometers is greater than Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A350-900 can fly nonstop approximately 4,302 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A350-900 can hold 37,248 gallons of fuel, which is 13,288 gallons more than the Boeing 767-300ER’s tank capacity of 23,960 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A350-900 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A350-900 can accommodate 319 passengers, which is about 58 passengers more than Boeing 767-300ER’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A350-900’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 351 passengers of the Boeing 767-300ER.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the Airbus A350-900

Launched in 2013, the Airbus A350-900 is a long-haul, wide-body aircraft designed for high-capacity travel. The modern twin-engine aircraft offers a combination of range, comfort, and fuel efficiency.

The A350-900, with a length of 219.2 feet (66.8 meters) and a wingspan of 212.4 feet (64.8 meters), stands out for its considerable size. Its wing area of 4,757.6 square feet (442.0 square meters) contributes to its aerodynamic efficiency. The aircraft accommodates 319 passengers in a typical three-class configuration. Its design prioritizes passenger comfort, incorporating features such as a quieter cabin and advanced air systems for a more pleasant travel experience. Equipped with Trent XWB turbofan engines that deliver a total thrust of 148,000 lbf (660.0 kN), the A350-900 boasts significant fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact. With a fuel capacity of 37,248 US gallons (141,000 liters), the aircraft achieves a range of 8,300 nautical miles (15,372 kilometers), enabling airlines to operate on extensive long-haul routes without stopovers.

In the competitive field of wide-body aircraft, the A350-900 challenges models like the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and the Boeing 777-200ER. It is recognized for its innovative use of materials, including extensive carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer, which contributes to weight reduction and overall efficiency. Key operators of the Airbus A350-900, such as Qatar Airways, Cathay Pacific, Lufthansa, and Delta Air Lines have utilized the aircraft for its operational flexibility and economic performance. The A350-900 serves a variety of long-range routes from domestic cross-country flights to international long-haul routes.

The Airbus A350-900's introduction into the market was a significant step in Airbus's strategy to offer cutting-edge, efficient aircraft. Its development reflects the manufacturer's response to airlines' demands for sustainable, high-capacity, and long-range travel solutions.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.