Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. Airbus A330-900

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

A330-900

Price (USD)
$105 Million$296 Million
First Flight
19862017
Body Type
Wide-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m180 ft
63 m208 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
64 m210 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
465 m²5,005 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
16 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
251,000 kg553,360 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211Rolls-Royce Trent 700
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
320 kN72,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
640 kN144,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
139,090 l36,744 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
13,334 km7,200 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
870 km/h541 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax300 pax
Max Seating
351 pax440 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A330-900

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A330-900 Size Comparison

  • At 63.70 meters, the Airbus A330-900 is 8.80 meters longer than the Boeing 767-300ER.
  • With a wingspan of 64 meters, the Airbus A330-900 is 16.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A330-900 have heights of 15.80 meters and 16.80 meters respectively - making the Airbus A330-900 1 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A330-900 Range

  • Airbus A330-900’s range of 13,334 kilometers is greater than Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A330-900 can fly nonstop approximately 2,264 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A330-900 can hold 36,744 gallons of fuel, which is 12,784 gallons more than the Boeing 767-300ER’s tank capacity of 23,960 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A330-900 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A330-900 can accommodate 300 passengers, which is about 39 passengers more than Boeing 767-300ER’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A330-900’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 351 passengers of the Boeing 767-300ER.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the Airbus A330-900

Introduced in 2017, the Airbus A330-900 is part of the A330neo family, a wide-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for medium to long-haul flights. This aircraft represents an evolution of the A330-300, offering enhanced efficiency and technology while maintaining operational commonality with its predecessor.

The A330-900 stands at 208.9 feet (63.7 meters) in length with a wingspan of 210 feet (64 meters). It can comfortably seat 260- 300 passengers, providing airlines with a high-capacity option for various routes. On the exterior, the A330neos have a few changes from the CEO variants, including the redesigned curved windshield, new winglets, and upgraded engines. Powered by the latest-generation Rolls-Royce Trent 7000 engines, the A330-900 has a maximum total thrust of 144,000 lbf (640 kN) and a fuel capacity of 139,090 liters (36,744 US gallons). These features enable the aircraft to achieve a range of 7,200 nautical miles (13,334 kilometers), making it ideal for a wide range of international operations.

Competing with models like the Boeing 787-10, the Airbus A330-900 is a compelling option in the twin-aisle market for airlines seeking a balance of range, capacity, and efficiency. In commercial service, the Airbus A330-900 serves airlines requiring a versatile aircraft for both high-density regional flights and long-distance international flights. Through late 2023, they were 115 aircraft in service with 22 operators. Some notable commercial airlines using the A330-900 are Delta Air Lines, Condor, Cebu Pacific, and Azul Brazilian Airlines.

The Airbus A330-900 continues to be a significant addition to the fleets of global airlines, demonstrating its capability to meet the challenges of modern air travel with its advanced design and performance features.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.