Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. Airbus A320neo

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

A320neo

Price (USD)
$105 Million$110 Million
First Flight
19862014
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
54 m180 ft
37 m123 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
35 m117 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
122 m²1,317 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
4 m13 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
11 m38 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
79,000 kg174,165 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211CFMI LEAP-1A / Pratt & Whitney PW1000G
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
108 kN24,200 lbf
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
216 kN48,400 lbf
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
26,730 l7,061 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
6,300 km3,402 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
833 km/h518 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax180 pax
Max Seating
351 pax194 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A320neo

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320neo Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 17.30 meters longer than the Airbus A320neo.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 11.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A320neo have heights of 15.80 meters and 11.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 4 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320neo Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than Airbus A320neo’s range of 6,300 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 4,770 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 16,899 gallons more than the Airbus A320neo’s tank capacity of 7,061 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320neo Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 81 passengers more than Airbus A320neo’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 194 passengers of the Airbus A320neo.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the Airbus A320neo

The Airbus A320neo is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner optimized for short to medium-haul flights. Launched in 2014, the A320neo (New Engine Option) represents a significant update over the earlier A320 models with improved fuel efficiency and renovated cabins.

Standing at 123.4 feet (37.6 meters) long and a wingspan of 117.5 feet (35.8 meters), the A320neo maintains the familiar dimensions of the A320 family while incorporating key enhancements. The aircraft typically accommodates around 180 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, with a maximum capacity of 194 passengers. This seating arrangement makes the A320neo suitable for both short and medium haul routes. The A320neo is notable for its upgraded engine options, either the CFM International LEAP-1A or the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM, which provide a thrust of up to 48,400 lbf (216.0 kN). These advanced engines contribute to a significant reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions, aligning with global environmental objectives. According to Airbus, the A320neo delivers about 20% fuel savings and CO2 reduction compared to previous-generation models. In addition to its engine advancements, the A320neo features aerodynamic refinements, including the incorporation of Sharklet wingtips, which further enhance its fuel efficiency.

The aircraft's cabin, known for its comfort and efficiency, offers passengers a pleasant travel experience with modern amenities and larger overhead storage compartments. A320neos are typically configured to seat 140 passengers in a one-class layout, or 180 in a two-class layout. Prominent operators include IndiGo, Wizz Air, China Eastern, Frontier Airlines, SAS, Easyjet, and Spirit Airlines. As of late 2023, over 1800 A320neos have been delivered, with over 2000 units still waiting to be built. In the current commercial aviation landscape, the A320neo completes most closely with the Boeing 737-800 and 737 MAX 8.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.