Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. Airbus A320-200

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

A320-200

Price (USD)
$105 Million$101 Million
First Flight
19861987
Body Type
Wide-bodyNarrow-body
Length
54 m180 ft
37 m123 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
35 m117 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
122 m²1,317 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
4 m13 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
11 m38 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
78,000 kg171,961 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211CMFI CFM56 / IAE V2500
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
120 kN27,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
240 kN54,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
27,200 l7,185 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
6,200 km3,348 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
840 km/h522 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax170 pax
Max Seating
351 pax180 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A320-200

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320-200 Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 17.30 meters longer than the Airbus A320-200.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 11.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and Airbus A320-200 have heights of 15.80 meters and 11.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 4 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320-200 Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than Airbus A320-200’s range of 6,200 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 4,870 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 16,775 gallons more than the Airbus A320-200’s tank capacity of 7,185 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A320-200 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 91 passengers more than Airbus A320-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 180 passengers of the Airbus A320-200.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the Airbus A320-200

The Airbus A320-200 is a narrow-body, twin-engine aircraft, primarily employed for short to medium-haul flights. Introduced in the late 1980s, this model was designed with an emphasis on increased fuel capacity and range.

With dimensions of 123.3 feet (37.6 meters) in length and a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A320-200 is configured typically to accommodate 150 to 180 passengers in a standard two-class layout. This seating capacity enables the aircraft to efficiently serve both high-density and lower-demand routes. The A320-200 incorporates fly-by-wire technology, a notable feature in commercial aviation at the time of its introduction, replacing traditional manual flight controls with an electronic interface. The aircraft is equipped with advanced avionics and an electronic flight instrument system in the cockpit, reflecting the technological standards of the era. Powered by CFM56 or IAE V2500 engines, the -200 variant is designed for a balance of thrust and fuel efficiency. It has a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 170,000 lbs and a range of about 3,300 nautical miles, dependent on load and configuration.

Several airlines have incorporated the Airbus A320-200 into their fleets, utilizing it for a variety of operational needs. Prominent operators include Lufthansa, British Airways, and AirAsia. These carriers have employed the jetliner for its ability to efficiently handle both short domestic services and longer intercontinental routes. As a key variant in the A320 family, the Airbus A320-200 has contributed to Airbus's presence in the narrow-body aircraft market. Its use by various airlines demonstrates its functionality across different types of commercial aviation operations.

Today, the Airbus A320-200 continues to be an operational part of numerous airline fleets, fulfilling its intended roles across various route networks. While no longer in production, it is succeeded by the newer A320neo.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.