Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-300 vs. McDonnell Douglas MD-11

vs.
Compare

757-300

vs.

MD-11

Price (USD)
$81 Million$75 Million
First Flight
19981990
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m178 ft
61 m202 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
52 m170 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
338 m²3,647 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
6 m19 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
17.7m 57 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
123,800 kg272,932 lbs
273,294 kg602,510 lbs
Number of Engines
23
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney 4000
Max Thrust Per Engine
193 kN43,500 lbf
274 kN61,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
387 kN87,000 lbf
822 kN123,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
43,400 l11,465 gal
146,173 l38,615 gal
Range
6,295 km3,399 nm
12,455 km6,725 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
876 km/h544 mph
Typical Seating
262 pax298 pax
Max Seating
295 pax410 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-300 and McDonnell Douglas MD-11

Boeing 757-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Size Comparison

  • At 61.60 meters, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 is 7.20 meters longer than the Boeing 757-300.
  • With a wingspan of 52 meters, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 is 14 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-300 and McDonnell Douglas MD-11 have heights of 13.60 meters and 17.70 meters respectively - making the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 4.10 meters taller.

Boeing 757-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Range

  • McDonnell Douglas MD-11’s range of 12,455 kilometers is greater than Boeing 757-300’s range of 6,295 kilometers. Therefore, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 can fly nonstop approximately 6,160 kilometers further.
  • The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 can hold 38,615 gallons of fuel, which is 27,150 gallons more than the Boeing 757-300’s tank capacity of 11,465 gallons.

Boeing 757-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 can accommodate 298 passengers, which is about 36 passengers more than Boeing 757-300’s seating capacity.
  • The McDonnell Douglas MD-11’s max seating capacity is 410 passengers, compared to 295 passengers of the Boeing 757-300.

About the Boeing 757-300

The Boeing 757-300, an extended variant of the popular 757 series, is a narrow-body, twin engine aircraft serving medium-long haul routes. As a stretched version of the 757-200, the 757-300 was designed to accommodate a higher passenger capacity while maintaining the series' operational efficiency and versatility. The B753 entered the commercial aviation market in 1998 with the German airline Condor.

Sometimes referred to as the "flying pencil", the 757-300 has a rather long and skinny fuselage. It measures in at over 54 meters (178 feet), making it the longest, single-aisle twinjet ever built. The wingspan remains at 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), and the wing area is 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet), consistent with the 757 series design. The extended fuselage of the 757-300 allows it to carry a larger number of passengers, enhancing its appeal for airlines looking to maximize capacity on popular routes.

The typical seating arrangement in the 757-300 is designed to accommodate about 262 passengers. This configuration usually includes a dual-class layout, with the majority of the cabin dedicated to economy class in a 3-3 seat configuration, alongside a smaller business class section. This layout enables airlines to optimize the balance between passenger comfort and density, making the aircraft particularly suitable for high-demand, medium-range routes.

Powered by Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt & Whitney PW2043s the 757-300 is capable of delivering a maximum thrust of 387.0 kN (87,000 lbf), the Boeing 757-300 offers a range of approximately 6,295 kilometers (3,399 nautical miles). This range, combined with its passenger capacity, positions the 757-300 as a competitive option for airlines operating busy domestic and transcontinental routes.

In the market, the Boeing 757-300 faced competition from similar narrow-body aircraft, such as variants from the Airbus A321 series and the McDonnell Douglas MD-90. These aircraft offered comparable range and capacity, creating a competitive landscape in the segment of extended narrow-body airliners. Production for the 757-300 totaled just 55 aircraft. Airlines that have incorporated the Boeing 757-300 into their fleets include Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines), Delta Air Lines, and Icelandair. These carriers have utilized the aircraft's unique combination of capacity and range to efficiently serve a mix of domestic and international routes, underscoring the 757-300's utility in commercial aviation.

The Boeing 757-300, while not as widely produced as its shorter counterpart, the 757-200, still marks an important development in the evolution of the 757 series. Its extended fuselage and increased capacity cater to specific market needs, demonstrating Boeing's adaptability in responding to evolving airline requirements. As a variant of one of the most recognizable narrow-body aircraft families, the 757-300 continues to play a role in the global aviation industry, particularly in markets where capacity and efficiency are paramount.

About the McDonnell Douglas MD-11

The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 is a wide-body, tri-jet airliner, recognized for its extended range and enhanced capabilities in long-haul commercial aviation. As a successor to the iconic DC-10, the MD-11 incorporated advanced technology and design improvements, making it a significant model in the evolution of wide-body aircraft. The MD-11 took its maiden flight in 1990, and was produced until the turn of the 21st century. There are no MD-11s servicing passenger flights today, but some MD-11 are still being used for freight operations with FedEx, UPS, and Western Global Airlines.

With a length of 61.6 meters (202.1 feet), the MD-11 is notably longer than the DC-10, which provided increased passenger and cargo capacity. This extension in length was complemented by a wingspan of 52.0 meters (170.5 feet), which included winglets for improved aerodynamic efficiency. The MD-11's was equipped with GE CF6-80C2s or PW4000 turbofan engines, which delivered a total maximum thrust of 822.0 kN (123,000 lbf). With a substantial fuel capacity of 146,173 liters (38,615 US gallons), the MD-11 boasts a range of approximately 12,455 kilometers (6,725 nautical miles), enabling it to operate on intercontinental routes with ease.

The MD-11 comfortably accommodated 298 passengers, and could be designed to fit over 340 in a higher density configuration. The most common configurations for the twin aisle jet included 9 seats to a row (3-3-3 or 3-4-2).

In the competitive landscape of long-haul airliners, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 was positioned as an alternative to models like the Boeing 747 and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar. By 2004, most carriers that utilized the MD-11 for long-haul passenger routes had replaced it with the Airbus A330, A340, and Boeing 777. When Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas in 1997, it ultimately created internal competition for the MD-11 with the 767 and 777. A lack of interest from the market also lead to Boeing cutting production for the commercial variant short, while the freight version was continued for slightly longer.

KLM, Swissair, and Delta Air Lines were among the airlines who utilized the aircraft's range and capacity to expand their international route offerings. The MD-11's operational role was characterized by its ability to efficiently serve long-haul routes, offering a blend of passenger comfort and operational economics. Some airlines like China Eastern Airlines and Korean Air had converted their MD-11 aircraft into freighters rather than selling or retiring them.

The MD-11's production and service history reflect its role as a pivotal model in the wide-body aircraft segment. Its design and technological advancements, including the use of winglets and a glass cockpit, marked important steps in the advancement of commercial aircraft design. Although its production was eventually surpassed by more modern aircraft, the MD-11 remains a notable aircraft in the history of aviation, particularly for its contributions to long-haul air travel.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.