Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-300 vs. Airbus A340-300

vs.
Compare

757-300

vs.

A340-300

Price (USD)
$81 Million$110 Million
First Flight
19981991
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m178 ft
63 m209 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
60 m197 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
361 m²3,892 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
17 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
123,800 kg272,932 lbs
276,500 kg609,578 lbs
Number of Engines
24
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000CFMI CFM56
Max Thrust Per Engine
193 kN43,500 lbf
150 kN34,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
387 kN87,000 lbf
600 kN136,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
43,400 l11,465 gal
147,850 l39,058 gal
Range
6,295 km3,399 nm
13,500 km7,289 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
870 km/h541 mph
Typical Seating
262 pax300 pax
Max Seating
295 pax440 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A340-300

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-300 Size Comparison

  • At 63.70 meters, the Airbus A340-300 is 9.30 meters longer than the Boeing 757-300.
  • With a wingspan of 60.30 meters, the Airbus A340-300 is 22.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A340-300 have heights of 13.60 meters and 17 meters respectively - making the Airbus A340-300 3.40 meters taller.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-300 Range

  • Airbus A340-300’s range of 13,500 kilometers is greater than Boeing 757-300’s range of 6,295 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A340-300 can fly nonstop approximately 7,205 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A340-300 can hold 39,058 gallons of fuel, which is 27,593 gallons more than the Boeing 757-300’s tank capacity of 11,465 gallons.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-300 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A340-300 can accommodate 300 passengers, which is about 38 passengers more than Boeing 757-300’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A340-300’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 295 passengers of the Boeing 757-300.

About the Boeing 757-300

The Boeing 757-300, an extended variant of the popular 757 series, is a narrow-body, twin engine aircraft serving medium-long haul routes. As a stretched version of the 757-200, the 757-300 was designed to accommodate a higher passenger capacity while maintaining the series' operational efficiency and versatility. The B753 entered the commercial aviation market in 1998 with the German airline Condor.

Sometimes referred to as the "flying pencil", the 757-300 has a rather long and skinny fuselage. It measures in at over 54 meters (178 feet), making it the longest, single-aisle twinjet ever built. The wingspan remains at 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), and the wing area is 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet), consistent with the 757 series design. The extended fuselage of the 757-300 allows it to carry a larger number of passengers, enhancing its appeal for airlines looking to maximize capacity on popular routes.

The typical seating arrangement in the 757-300 is designed to accommodate about 262 passengers. This configuration usually includes a dual-class layout, with the majority of the cabin dedicated to economy class in a 3-3 seat configuration, alongside a smaller business class section. This layout enables airlines to optimize the balance between passenger comfort and density, making the aircraft particularly suitable for high-demand, medium-range routes.

Powered by Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt & Whitney PW2043s the 757-300 is capable of delivering a maximum thrust of 387.0 kN (87,000 lbf), the Boeing 757-300 offers a range of approximately 6,295 kilometers (3,399 nautical miles). This range, combined with its passenger capacity, positions the 757-300 as a competitive option for airlines operating busy domestic and transcontinental routes.

In the market, the Boeing 757-300 faced competition from similar narrow-body aircraft, such as variants from the Airbus A321 series and the McDonnell Douglas MD-90. These aircraft offered comparable range and capacity, creating a competitive landscape in the segment of extended narrow-body airliners. Production for the 757-300 totaled just 55 aircraft. Airlines that have incorporated the Boeing 757-300 into their fleets include Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines), Delta Air Lines, and Icelandair. These carriers have utilized the aircraft's unique combination of capacity and range to efficiently serve a mix of domestic and international routes, underscoring the 757-300's utility in commercial aviation.

The Boeing 757-300, while not as widely produced as its shorter counterpart, the 757-200, still marks an important development in the evolution of the 757 series. Its extended fuselage and increased capacity cater to specific market needs, demonstrating Boeing's adaptability in responding to evolving airline requirements. As a variant of one of the most recognizable narrow-body aircraft families, the 757-300 continues to play a role in the global aviation industry, particularly in markets where capacity and efficiency are paramount.

About the Airbus A340-300

Launched in 1991, the Airbus A340-300 is a long-range, wide-body jetliner and a member of the Airbus A340 family. This aircraft, with its four-engine setup, was designed for extended range operations, particularly on routes where twin-engine operation was not feasible.

The A340-300 extends 209 feet (63.7 meters) in length and has a wingspan of 197.8 feet (60.3 meters). It offers a typical seating arrangement for 300 passengers in a standard layout, and up to 440 passengers in a higher-density configuration. The aircraft's cabin is designed for passenger comfort, featuring a quiet and spacious environment ideal for long-haul flights. Powered by four engines, each providing a thrust of 34,000 lbf (600 kN), the A340-300 has a range of 7,289 nautical miles (13,500 kilometers) and a fuel capacity of 147,850 liters (39,058 US gallons). These specifications make the A340-300 well-suited for routes such as transatlantic and transpacific flights, where its range and capacity are advantageous.

The A340-300 competes with aircraft like the Boeing 777-300ER, offering airlines an alternative for long-haul operations. It has been favored by carriers for its reliability and ability to serve long distances without the need for a stopover. Airlines such as Lufthansa, Air France, and Cathay Pacific have utilized the Airbus A340-300 in their fleets, capitalizing on its ability to efficiently handle long-range routes with significant passenger loads.

The Airbus A340-300's introduction to the market was a response to airline requirements for a high-capacity, long-range aircraft. Its operational role has been shaped by its unique four-engine configuration and ability to connect distant city pairs with a medium to high passenger capacity.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.