Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-300 vs. Airbus A340-200

vs.
Compare

757-300

vs.

A340-200

Price (USD)
$81 Million$105 Million
First Flight
19981992
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m178 ft
59 m194 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
60 m197 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
361 m²3,892 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
16 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
123,800 kg272,932 lbs
275,000 kg606,271 lbs
Number of Engines
24
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000CFMI CFM56
Max Thrust Per Engine
193 kN43,500 lbf
150 kN34,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
387 kN87,000 lbf
600 kN136,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
43,400 l11,465 gal
155,040 l40,957 gal
Range
6,295 km3,399 nm
12,400 km6,695 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
870 km/h541 mph
Typical Seating
262 pax250 pax
Max Seating
295 pax420 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A340-200

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-200 Size Comparison

  • At 59.40 meters, the Airbus A340-200 is 5 meters longer than the Boeing 757-300.
  • With a wingspan of 60.30 meters, the Airbus A340-200 is 22.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A340-200 have heights of 13.60 meters and 16.80 meters respectively - making the Airbus A340-200 3.20 meters taller.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-200 Range

  • Airbus A340-200’s range of 12,400 kilometers is greater than Boeing 757-300’s range of 6,295 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A340-200 can fly nonstop approximately 6,105 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A340-200 can hold 40,957 gallons of fuel, which is 29,492 gallons more than the Boeing 757-300’s tank capacity of 11,465 gallons.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A340-200 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 757-300 can accommodate 262 passengers, which is about 12 passengers more than Airbus A340-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A340-200’s max seating capacity is 420 passengers, compared to 295 passengers of the Boeing 757-300.

About the Boeing 757-300

The Boeing 757-300, an extended variant of the popular 757 series, is a narrow-body, twin engine aircraft serving medium-long haul routes. As a stretched version of the 757-200, the 757-300 was designed to accommodate a higher passenger capacity while maintaining the series' operational efficiency and versatility. The B753 entered the commercial aviation market in 1998 with the German airline Condor.

Sometimes referred to as the "flying pencil", the 757-300 has a rather long and skinny fuselage. It measures in at over 54 meters (178 feet), making it the longest, single-aisle twinjet ever built. The wingspan remains at 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), and the wing area is 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet), consistent with the 757 series design. The extended fuselage of the 757-300 allows it to carry a larger number of passengers, enhancing its appeal for airlines looking to maximize capacity on popular routes.

The typical seating arrangement in the 757-300 is designed to accommodate about 262 passengers. This configuration usually includes a dual-class layout, with the majority of the cabin dedicated to economy class in a 3-3 seat configuration, alongside a smaller business class section. This layout enables airlines to optimize the balance between passenger comfort and density, making the aircraft particularly suitable for high-demand, medium-range routes.

Powered by Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt & Whitney PW2043s the 757-300 is capable of delivering a maximum thrust of 387.0 kN (87,000 lbf), the Boeing 757-300 offers a range of approximately 6,295 kilometers (3,399 nautical miles). This range, combined with its passenger capacity, positions the 757-300 as a competitive option for airlines operating busy domestic and transcontinental routes.

In the market, the Boeing 757-300 faced competition from similar narrow-body aircraft, such as variants from the Airbus A321 series and the McDonnell Douglas MD-90. These aircraft offered comparable range and capacity, creating a competitive landscape in the segment of extended narrow-body airliners. Production for the 757-300 totaled just 55 aircraft. Airlines that have incorporated the Boeing 757-300 into their fleets include Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines), Delta Air Lines, and Icelandair. These carriers have utilized the aircraft's unique combination of capacity and range to efficiently serve a mix of domestic and international routes, underscoring the 757-300's utility in commercial aviation.

The Boeing 757-300, while not as widely produced as its shorter counterpart, the 757-200, still marks an important development in the evolution of the 757 series. Its extended fuselage and increased capacity cater to specific market needs, demonstrating Boeing's adaptability in responding to evolving airline requirements. As a variant of one of the most recognizable narrow-body aircraft families, the 757-300 continues to play a role in the global aviation industry, particularly in markets where capacity and efficiency are paramount.

About the Airbus A340-200

The Airbus A340-200 is a long-range, wide-body aircraft, part of the A340 family known for its four-engine configuration. Introduced in 1992, the quadjet was designed to meet the demands of long-haul flights. The A340-200 has a longer wingspan (60.3 meters) than length (59.4 meters). The -200 version of the A340 has typical seating capacity for 250 passengers in a standard layout and a maximum capacity of 420 passengers.

Equipped with four engines that provide 136,000 pounds of thrust (600 kN), the A340-200 is recognized for its ability to cover significant distances, with a range of 6,695 nautical miles (12,400 kilometers). The aircraft's fuel capacity of 155,040 liters (40,957 US gallons) contributes to its long-range capabilities, making it suitable for routes such as transatlantic and transpacific flights. The aircraft's spacious cabin offers comfort for passengers on long-haul journeys, and its four-engine design provides additional reliability over vast oceanic and remote areas.

Competing with models like the Boeing 777-200ER, the A340-200 offered airlines a long-range option with a unique four-engine configuration. Its role in commercial aviation has been defined by its capacity to serve long-distance routes with a medium passenger load, meeting the needs of airlines for intercontinental travel.

The Airbus A340-200 has been operated by airlines such as Lufthansa and Air France, serving as a key component in their long-haul fleets. Only a small number of the -200 remain in service today. Additionally, it turned out that the -300 and -600 versions of the A340 were much more popular.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.