Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-300 vs. Airbus A320neo

vs.
Compare

757-300

vs.

A320neo

Price (USD)
$81 Million$110 Million
First Flight
19982014
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
54 m178 ft
37 m123 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
35 m117 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
122 m²1,317 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
4 m13 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
11 m38 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
123,800 kg272,932 lbs
79,000 kg174,165 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000CFMI LEAP-1A / Pratt & Whitney PW1000G
Max Thrust Per Engine
193 kN43,500 lbf
108 kN24,200 lbf
Max Total Thrust
387 kN87,000 lbf
216 kN48,400 lbf
Fuel Capacity
43,400 l11,465 gal
26,730 l7,061 gal
Range
6,295 km3,399 nm
6,300 km3,402 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
833 km/h518 mph
Typical Seating
262 pax180 pax
Max Seating
295 pax194 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A320neo

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A320neo Size Comparison

  • At 54.40 meters, the Boeing 757-300 is 16.80 meters longer than the Airbus A320neo.
  • With a wingspan of 38 meters, the Boeing 757-300 is 2.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-300 and Airbus A320neo have heights of 13.60 meters and 11.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 757-300 1.80 meters taller.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A320neo Range

  • Airbus A320neo’s range of 6,300 kilometers is greater than Boeing 757-300’s range of 6,295 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A320neo can fly nonstop approximately 5 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 757-300 can hold 11,465 gallons of fuel, which is 4,404 gallons more than the Airbus A320neo’s tank capacity of 7,061 gallons.

Boeing 757-300 vs Airbus A320neo Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 757-300 can accommodate 262 passengers, which is about 82 passengers more than Airbus A320neo’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 757-300’s max seating capacity is 295 passengers, compared to 194 passengers of the Airbus A320neo.

About the Boeing 757-300

The Boeing 757-300, an extended variant of the popular 757 series, is a narrow-body, twin engine aircraft serving medium-long haul routes. As a stretched version of the 757-200, the 757-300 was designed to accommodate a higher passenger capacity while maintaining the series' operational efficiency and versatility. The B753 entered the commercial aviation market in 1998 with the German airline Condor.

Sometimes referred to as the "flying pencil", the 757-300 has a rather long and skinny fuselage. It measures in at over 54 meters (178 feet), making it the longest, single-aisle twinjet ever built. The wingspan remains at 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), and the wing area is 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet), consistent with the 757 series design. The extended fuselage of the 757-300 allows it to carry a larger number of passengers, enhancing its appeal for airlines looking to maximize capacity on popular routes.

The typical seating arrangement in the 757-300 is designed to accommodate about 262 passengers. This configuration usually includes a dual-class layout, with the majority of the cabin dedicated to economy class in a 3-3 seat configuration, alongside a smaller business class section. This layout enables airlines to optimize the balance between passenger comfort and density, making the aircraft particularly suitable for high-demand, medium-range routes.

Powered by Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt & Whitney PW2043s the 757-300 is capable of delivering a maximum thrust of 387.0 kN (87,000 lbf), the Boeing 757-300 offers a range of approximately 6,295 kilometers (3,399 nautical miles). This range, combined with its passenger capacity, positions the 757-300 as a competitive option for airlines operating busy domestic and transcontinental routes.

In the market, the Boeing 757-300 faced competition from similar narrow-body aircraft, such as variants from the Airbus A321 series and the McDonnell Douglas MD-90. These aircraft offered comparable range and capacity, creating a competitive landscape in the segment of extended narrow-body airliners. Production for the 757-300 totaled just 55 aircraft. Airlines that have incorporated the Boeing 757-300 into their fleets include Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines), Delta Air Lines, and Icelandair. These carriers have utilized the aircraft's unique combination of capacity and range to efficiently serve a mix of domestic and international routes, underscoring the 757-300's utility in commercial aviation.

The Boeing 757-300, while not as widely produced as its shorter counterpart, the 757-200, still marks an important development in the evolution of the 757 series. Its extended fuselage and increased capacity cater to specific market needs, demonstrating Boeing's adaptability in responding to evolving airline requirements. As a variant of one of the most recognizable narrow-body aircraft families, the 757-300 continues to play a role in the global aviation industry, particularly in markets where capacity and efficiency are paramount.

About the Airbus A320neo

The Airbus A320neo is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner optimized for short to medium-haul flights. Launched in 2014, the A320neo (New Engine Option) represents a significant update over the earlier A320 models with improved fuel efficiency and renovated cabins.

Standing at 123.4 feet (37.6 meters) long and a wingspan of 117.5 feet (35.8 meters), the A320neo maintains the familiar dimensions of the A320 family while incorporating key enhancements. The aircraft typically accommodates around 180 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, with a maximum capacity of 194 passengers. This seating arrangement makes the A320neo suitable for both short and medium haul routes. The A320neo is notable for its upgraded engine options, either the CFM International LEAP-1A or the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM, which provide a thrust of up to 48,400 lbf (216.0 kN). These advanced engines contribute to a significant reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions, aligning with global environmental objectives. According to Airbus, the A320neo delivers about 20% fuel savings and CO2 reduction compared to previous-generation models. In addition to its engine advancements, the A320neo features aerodynamic refinements, including the incorporation of Sharklet wingtips, which further enhance its fuel efficiency.

The aircraft's cabin, known for its comfort and efficiency, offers passengers a pleasant travel experience with modern amenities and larger overhead storage compartments. A320neos are typically configured to seat 140 passengers in a one-class layout, or 180 in a two-class layout. Prominent operators include IndiGo, Wizz Air, China Eastern, Frontier Airlines, SAS, Easyjet, and Spirit Airlines. As of late 2023, over 1800 A320neos have been delivered, with over 2000 units still waiting to be built. In the current commercial aviation landscape, the A320neo completes most closely with the Boeing 737-800 and 737 MAX 8.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.