Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-200 vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

757-200

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$73 Million$20 Million
First Flight
19821984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
47 m155 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
115,700 kg255,075 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
179 kN40,200 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
358 kN80,400 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
43,490 l11,489 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
7,250 km3,915 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
200 pax44 pax
Max Seating
239 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-200 and ATR 42-600

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 47.30 meters, the Boeing 757-200 is 24.60 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 38 meters, the Boeing 757-200 is 13.40 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-200 and ATR 42-600 have heights of 13.60 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 757-200 6 meters taller.

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Boeing 757-200’s range of 7,250 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 757-200 can fly nonstop approximately 5,924 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 757-200 can hold 11,489 gallons of fuel, which is 9,975 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Boeing 757-200 vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 757-200 can accommodate 200 passengers, which is about 156 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 757-200’s max seating capacity is 239 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Boeing 757-200

The Boeing 757-200, classified as a narrow-body commercial airliner targeting the medium to long-range flight market. Production commenced in the early 1980s, with the first units entering service in 1982. Over the years, the Boeing 757-200 (abbreviated as B752) gained traction in commercial aviation, being used in a variety of roles ranging from busy shuttle services to transatlantic routes. When it comes to international use of the 757-200, carriers most commonly utilize the type for transatlantic routes between the US and Europe. The -200 is particularly advantageous for serving destinations where passenger volumes are insufficient for wide-body aircraft. The -200 is the original version of the 757, with the updated and enlarged -300 entering service in 1999.

The 757-200's dimensions include a length of 47.3 meters (155.2 feet) and a wingspan of 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), coupled with a wing area of 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet). The aircraft's propulsion system, consisting of engines capable of a maximum thrust of 358.0 kN (80,400 lbf), supports a range of approximately 7,250 kilometers (3,915 nautical miles), making it suitable for both domestic and international routes. In terms of seating capacity, the Boeing 757-200 can typically accommodate around 200 passengers in a standard configuration, with the possibility of seating up to 239 passengers. This flexibility in cabin layout allowed airlines to optimize the aircraft for various service requirements.

The Boeing 757-200's main competitors in the market is the Airbus A321. These aircraft offered similar capabilities in terms of range and passenger capacity, leading to a competitive landscape in the medium-haul market segment. The newer A321neo and Boeing 737 MAX 9 are expected to replace 757-200s as they are moved into retirement. Prominent airlines that have operated the Boeing 757-200 include Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and British Airways. These carriers utilized the 757-200 extensively for its operational flexibility, allowing them to serve a wide range of routes effectively.

As a product of its time, the Boeing 757-200 embodied the technological and design philosophies of the era, catering to the specific demands of medium to long-haul air travel. Its widespread use by various airlines underscores its alignment with the operational needs of the commercial aviation industry during its production and operational tenure.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.