Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 757-200 vs. Airbus A330-300

vs.
Compare

757-200

vs.

A330-300

Price (USD)
$73 Million$256 Million
First Flight
19821992
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
47 m155 ft
63 m208 ft
Wingspan
38 m124 ft
60 m197 ft
Wing Area
185 m²1,994 ft²
361 m²3,892 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
13 m44 ft
16 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
115,700 kg255,075 lbs
242,000 kg533,519 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000General Electric CF6 / Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / Rolls-Royce Trent 700
Max Thrust Per Engine
179 kN40,200 lbf
316 kN71,100 lbf
Max Total Thrust
358 kN80,400 lbf
632 kN142,200 lbf
Fuel Capacity
43,490 l11,489 gal
139,090 l36,744 gal
Range
7,250 km3,915 nm
11,750 km6,344 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
870 km/h541 mph
Typical Seating
200 pax290 pax
Max Seating
239 pax440 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 757-200 and Airbus A330-300

Boeing 757-200 vs Airbus A330-300 Size Comparison

  • At 63.70 meters, the Airbus A330-300 is 16.40 meters longer than the Boeing 757-200.
  • With a wingspan of 60.30 meters, the Airbus A330-300 is 22.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 757-200 and Airbus A330-300 have heights of 13.60 meters and 16.80 meters respectively - making the Airbus A330-300 3.20 meters taller.

Boeing 757-200 vs Airbus A330-300 Range

  • Airbus A330-300’s range of 11,750 kilometers is greater than Boeing 757-200’s range of 7,250 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A330-300 can fly nonstop approximately 4,500 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A330-300 can hold 36,744 gallons of fuel, which is 25,255 gallons more than the Boeing 757-200’s tank capacity of 11,489 gallons.

Boeing 757-200 vs Airbus A330-300 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A330-300 can accommodate 290 passengers, which is about 90 passengers more than Boeing 757-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A330-300’s max seating capacity is 440 passengers, compared to 239 passengers of the Boeing 757-200.

About the Boeing 757-200

The Boeing 757-200, classified as a narrow-body commercial airliner targeting the medium to long-range flight market. Production commenced in the early 1980s, with the first units entering service in 1982. Over the years, the Boeing 757-200 (abbreviated as B752) gained traction in commercial aviation, being used in a variety of roles ranging from busy shuttle services to transatlantic routes. When it comes to international use of the 757-200, carriers most commonly utilize the type for transatlantic routes between the US and Europe. The -200 is particularly advantageous for serving destinations where passenger volumes are insufficient for wide-body aircraft. The -200 is the original version of the 757, with the updated and enlarged -300 entering service in 1999.

The 757-200's dimensions include a length of 47.3 meters (155.2 feet) and a wingspan of 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), coupled with a wing area of 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet). The aircraft's propulsion system, consisting of engines capable of a maximum thrust of 358.0 kN (80,400 lbf), supports a range of approximately 7,250 kilometers (3,915 nautical miles), making it suitable for both domestic and international routes. In terms of seating capacity, the Boeing 757-200 can typically accommodate around 200 passengers in a standard configuration, with the possibility of seating up to 239 passengers. This flexibility in cabin layout allowed airlines to optimize the aircraft for various service requirements.

The Boeing 757-200's main competitors in the market is the Airbus A321. These aircraft offered similar capabilities in terms of range and passenger capacity, leading to a competitive landscape in the medium-haul market segment. The newer A321neo and Boeing 737 MAX 9 are expected to replace 757-200s as they are moved into retirement. Prominent airlines that have operated the Boeing 757-200 include Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and British Airways. These carriers utilized the 757-200 extensively for its operational flexibility, allowing them to serve a wide range of routes effectively.

As a product of its time, the Boeing 757-200 embodied the technological and design philosophies of the era, catering to the specific demands of medium to long-haul air travel. Its widespread use by various airlines underscores its alignment with the operational needs of the commercial aviation industry during its production and operational tenure.

About the Airbus A330-300

The Airbus A330-300, launched in the early 1990s, was the first variant of the A330 series. This wide-body, twin-engine aircraft was developed to address the requirements of medium to long-haul flights, offering a blend of capacity and range that has been appealing to airlines globally.

The A330-300 extends to a length of 208.9 feet (63.7 meters), with a wingspan of 197.8 feet (60.3 meters). It typically seats around 277 passengers in a standard three-class layout, with the flexibility to accommodate more in higher-density configurations. The spacious and adaptable cabin has been a key selling point, providing airlines with the ability to tailor the passenger experience to different market segments. Equipped with engines from Rolls-Royce, Pratt & Whitney, or General Electric, the A330-300 is known for its reliable and efficient performance. It has a maximum takeoff weight of about 533,500 lbs and can travel up to 6,350 nautical miles, enabling airlines to serve a wide range of international destinations. From the outside, the A330 is most distinguishable by its boxy winglets, wing-mounted fuel tanks, and tilted landing gear. On the inside, it seats eight-abreast, with a 2–4–2 economy class. Overall, it shares many design features from the A340 and A300.

Prominent operators of the Airbus A330-300 include Cathay Pacific, Turkish Airlines, Scandinavian Airlines, Saudia, and Delta Air Lines. These airlines have leveraged the aircraft's capacity and range for various operational needs, utilizing it for both high-density domestic flights and longer international services. The development of the A330-300 was driven by airline demand for a high-capacity, efficient, and versatile aircraft. Its operational role has been shaped by its ability to efficiently serve long-haul routes with significant passenger loads, meeting the evolving needs of the global aviation market.

Today, the Airbus A330-300 remains a vital component in the fleets of various airlines, a testament to its enduring utility and appeal. Its combination of passenger capacity, operational range, and efficiency continues to make it a valuable asset for airlines navigating the complexities of modern air travel. It most closely completes with the 767-400ER and 787-9 from Boeing.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.